Farrukh Dustov vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava — Bastad CH Round of 32

Bastad CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
UZB
Farrukh Dustov
40 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2016
clay
ESP7
Daniel Munoz de la Nava
44 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Dustov F.
4-6 6-2 6-2
Munoz de la Nava D.
Dustov F.
4662
Munoz de la Nava D.
6221

Farrukh Dustov defeated Daniel Munoz de la Nava 4-6 6-2 6-2 in the Bastad CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Daniel Munoz de la Nava came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Farrukh Dustov claimed a first win over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-11-23Challenger Tour FinalsRRclayDaniel Munoz de la Nava7-6(3) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Dustov F.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Munoz de la Nava D.

Munoz de la Nava D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Dustov F.

Serve advantage — Munoz de la Nava D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Dustov F.Munoz de la Nava D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (46 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dustov F.Munoz de la Nava D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
61
Break points won·Clear edge
8
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
61
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zeballos H.[2]
Carballes Baena R.[5]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Zeballos H.[2]
Berlocq C.[3]
6-32-66-2
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Soderlund C.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Laaksonen H.
6-36-3
Zeballos H.[2]
Tepavac M.
7-656-4
Soderlund C.
Gimeno Traver D.
5-76-16-4
Berlocq C.[3]
Montanes A.[6]
2-66-26-3
R16
Tepavac M.
Kicker N.[8]
6-27-62
Berlocq C.[3]
Rublev A.
6-36-756-2
Montanes A.[6]
Zemlja G.
6-26-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Dustov F.
6-26-2
Soderlund C.
Fabbiano T.[4]
6-47-64
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Arvidsson I.
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.
Donskoy E.[1]
6-26-4
Zeballos H.[2]
Karatsev A.
6-26-1
R32
Zeballos H.[2]
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Karatsev A.
Ghem A.
6-46-4
Tepavac M.
Djere L.
6-36-0
Kicker N.[8]
Dubarenco M.
7-56-2
Berlocq C.[3]
Hurkacz H.
6-26-3
Rublev A.
Gunneswaran P.
6-737-57-63
Zemlja G.
Viola M.
7-51-67-62
Montanes A.[6]
Velotti A.
6-27-5
Dustov F.
Munoz de la Nava D.[7]
4-66-26-2
Gimeno Traver D.
Zopp J.
6-756-46-1
Soderlund C.
Lindell C.
7-56-2
Fabbiano T.[4]
Ymer E.
3-66-46-2
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Griekspoor S.
6-26-4
Arvidsson I.
Jankovic M.
6-27-67
Laaksonen H.
Eriksson M.
6-32-66-3
Donskoy E.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-3