Daniel Gimeno Traver vs Andrey Rublev — Marburg CH Round of 16

Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP
Daniel Gimeno Traver
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2016
clay
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Gimeno Traver D.
5-7 6-3 6-4
Rublev A.
Gimeno Traver D.
5662
Rublev A.
7341

Daniel Gimeno Traver defeated Andrey Rublev 5-7 6-3 6-4 in the Marburg CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gimeno Traver D.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gimeno Traver D.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Gimeno Traver D.Rublev A.
—
Serve
13
—
Return
64

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gimeno Traver D.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
76%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
67%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.2
7.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gimeno Traver D.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
15
88
Break points saved·Dominant
50
100
Break points won·Dominant
30
72
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
20
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gimeno Traver D.Rublev A.
Freshness·
—
100

Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Satral J.
Trungelliti M.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.
Reuter Y.
5-76-36-3
Satral J.
Brands D.[6]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-36-4
Reuter Y.
Arnaboldi A.
7-666-1
Satral J.
Kuzmanov D.
6-786-16-2
Brands D.[6]
Kicker N.[9]
6-46-716-3
R16
Kuzmanov D.
Darcis S.[4]
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.
Zverev M.
6-46-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Rublev A.
5-76-36-4
Reuter Y.
Melzer G.[3]
3-66-16-4
Arnaboldi A.
Lopez Perez E.
6-31-67-65
Satral J.
Michon A.
6-46-1
Brands D.[6]
Gombos N.
6-37-5
Kicker N.[9]
Gigounon G.
6-33-66-2
R32
Rublev A.
Munoz de la Nava D.[8]
6-20-0
Michon A.
Zhang Z.
7-657-63
Zverev M.
Basilashvili N.[2]
6-24-67-66
Trungelliti M.
Safwat M.
4-66-36-4
Gimeno Traver D.
Langer N.
7-605-76-1
Kicker N.[9]
Pena Lopez M.
6-766-36-3
Melzer G.[3]
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Reuter Y.
Lenz J.
6-46-3
Lopez Perez E.
Gaio F.
6-26-4
Arnaboldi A.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-36-3
Satral J.
Kamke T.[7]
6-23-66-2
Kuzmanov D.
De Greef A.
6-37-610
Darcis S.[4]
Lapentti G.
6-27-64
Brands D.[6]
Nagal S.
6-43-67-5
Gombos N.
Jahn J.
6-06-3
Gigounon G.
Perez Sanz D.
6-16-1