Andrey Rublev vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava — Marburg CH Round of 32

Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 27 June 2016
clay
ESP8
Daniel Munoz de la Nava
44 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Rublev A.
6-2 0-0
Munoz de la Nava D.
Rublev A.
60–
Munoz de la Nava D.
20–

Andrey Rublev advanced when Daniel Munoz de la Nava retired 6-2 0-0 in the Marburg CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Munoz de la Nava D.

Munoz de la Nava D.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Rublev A.Munoz de la Nava D.
13
Serve
—
64
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Munoz de la Nava D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Munoz de la Nava D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
13
Break points saved·Dominant
100
61
Break points won·Dominant
72
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Munoz de la Nava D.
Freshness·
100
—

Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Satral J.
Trungelliti M.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.
Reuter Y.
5-76-36-3
Satral J.
Brands D.[6]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-36-4
Reuter Y.
Arnaboldi A.
7-666-1
Satral J.
Kuzmanov D.
6-786-16-2
Brands D.[6]
Kicker N.[9]
6-46-716-3
R16
Kuzmanov D.
Darcis S.[4]
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.
Zverev M.
6-46-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Rublev A.
5-76-36-4
Reuter Y.
Melzer G.[3]
3-66-16-4
Arnaboldi A.
Lopez Perez E.
6-31-67-65
Satral J.
Michon A.
6-46-1
Brands D.[6]
Gombos N.
6-37-5
Kicker N.[9]
Gigounon G.
6-33-66-2
R32
Rublev A.
Munoz de la Nava D.[8]
6-20-0
Michon A.
Zhang Z.
7-657-63
Zverev M.
Basilashvili N.[2]
6-24-67-66
Trungelliti M.
Safwat M.
4-66-36-4
Gimeno Traver D.
Langer N.
7-605-76-1
Kicker N.[9]
Pena Lopez M.
6-766-36-3
Melzer G.[3]
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Reuter Y.
Lenz J.
6-46-3
Lopez Perez E.
Gaio F.
6-26-4
Arnaboldi A.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-36-3
Satral J.
Kamke T.[7]
6-23-66-2
Kuzmanov D.
De Greef A.
6-37-610
Darcis S.[4]
Lapentti G.
6-27-64
Brands D.[6]
Nagal S.
6-43-67-5
Gombos N.
Jahn J.
6-06-3
Gigounon G.
Perez Sanz D.
6-16-1