Sumit Nagal vs Maximilian Marterer — Marburg CH Qualifying Round 2

Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2016
clay
GER4
Maximilian Marterer
31 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Nagal S.
6-4 6-4
Marterer M.
Nagal S.
662
Marterer M.
440

Sumit Nagal defeated Maximilian Marterer 6-4 6-4 in the Marburg CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Marterer M.

Marterer M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Marterer M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Marterer M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
47
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
93
Break points won·Clear edge
35
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Marterer M.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q3
Nagal S.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-3
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Mager G.
7-53-66-3
Reuter Y.[3]
Eremin E.[8]
3-67-617-5
Gigounon G.
Lapentti G.[7]
6-46-0
Q2
Gunneswaran P.
Betov S.
6-26-4
Nagal S.
Marterer M.[4]
6-46-4
Eremin E.[8]
Hanfmann Y.
7-646-4
Reuter Y.[3]
Moraing M.
7-666-726-3
Lapentti G.[7]
Tabatruong M.
7-56-3
Gigounon G.
Velotti A.[2]
4-66-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Link J.
6-16-1
Mager G.
Londero J.[1]
6-36-1
Q1
Gunneswaran P.
Vatutin A.[5]
6-26-3
Betov S.
Heller P.
3-66-36-3
Nagal S.
Rodriguez R.
4-66-46-1
Eremin E.[8]
Bednarek T.
6-37-5
Hanfmann Y.
Galan D.
6-16-1
Moraing M.
Brinkman N.
6-36-2
Lapentti G.[7]
Sabanov M.
3-67-57-5
Tabatruong M.
Galarza J.
4-66-16-3
Gigounon G.
Schonenberg T.
6-44-66-2
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Sabanov I.
6-16-3
Link J.
Merunka S.
6-26-1
Mager G.
Tsegai B.
6-06-1