Daniel Gimeno Traver vs Nils Langer — Marburg CH Round of 32

Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP
Daniel Gimeno Traver
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2016
clay
GER
Nils Langer
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
Gimeno Traver D.
7-6 5-7 6-1
Langer N.
Gimeno Traver D.
77562
Langer N.
60711

Daniel Gimeno Traver defeated Nils Langer 7-6 5-7 6-1 in the Marburg CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nils Langer came in defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Gimeno Traver came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 5–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gimeno Traver D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Langer N.

Langer N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gimeno Traver D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gimeno Traver D.Langer N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 58). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gimeno Traver D.Langer N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
15
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
50
69
Break points won·Even
30
27
Deciding sets·Clear edge
24
11
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
20
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Satral J.
Trungelliti M.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.
Reuter Y.
5-76-36-3
Satral J.
Brands D.[6]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-36-4
Reuter Y.
Arnaboldi A.
7-666-1
Satral J.
Kuzmanov D.
6-786-16-2
Brands D.[6]
Kicker N.[9]
6-46-716-3
R16
Kuzmanov D.
Darcis S.[4]
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.
Zverev M.
6-46-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Rublev A.
5-76-36-4
Reuter Y.
Melzer G.[3]
3-66-16-4
Arnaboldi A.
Lopez Perez E.
6-31-67-65
Satral J.
Michon A.
6-46-1
Brands D.[6]
Gombos N.
6-37-5
Kicker N.[9]
Gigounon G.
6-33-66-2
R32
Rublev A.
Munoz de la Nava D.[8]
6-20-0
Michon A.
Zhang Z.
7-657-63
Zverev M.
Basilashvili N.[2]
6-24-67-66
Trungelliti M.
Safwat M.
4-66-36-4
Gimeno Traver D.
Langer N.
7-605-76-1
Kicker N.[9]
Pena Lopez M.
6-766-36-3
Melzer G.[3]
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Reuter Y.
Lenz J.
6-46-3
Lopez Perez E.
Gaio F.
6-26-4
Arnaboldi A.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-36-3
Satral J.
Kamke T.[7]
6-23-66-2
Kuzmanov D.
De Greef A.
6-37-610
Darcis S.[4]
Lapentti G.
6-27-64
Brands D.[6]
Nagal S.
6-43-67-5
Gombos N.
Jahn J.
6-06-3
Gigounon G.
Perez Sanz D.
6-16-1