Daniel Brands vs Sumit Nagal — Marburg CH Round of 32

Marburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER6
Daniel Brands
38 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2016
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
Brands D.
6-4 3-6 7-5
Nagal S.
Brands D.
6372
Nagal S.
4651

Daniel Brands defeated Sumit Nagal 6-4 3-6 7-5 in the Marburg CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Daniel Brands came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Brands closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brands D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Brands D.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brands D.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Even
66%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.2
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brands D.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
46
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
69
Break points won·Dominant
7
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
72
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
49
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Brands D.Nagal S.
Freshness·
—
96

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Satral J.
Trungelliti M.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.
Reuter Y.
5-76-36-3
Satral J.
Brands D.[6]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-36-4
Reuter Y.
Arnaboldi A.
7-666-1
Satral J.
Kuzmanov D.
6-786-16-2
Brands D.[6]
Kicker N.[9]
6-46-716-3
R16
Kuzmanov D.
Darcis S.[4]
6-30-0
Trungelliti M.
Zverev M.
6-46-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Rublev A.
5-76-36-4
Reuter Y.
Melzer G.[3]
3-66-16-4
Arnaboldi A.
Lopez Perez E.
6-31-67-65
Satral J.
Michon A.
6-46-1
Brands D.[6]
Gombos N.
6-37-5
Kicker N.[9]
Gigounon G.
6-33-66-2
R32
Rublev A.
Munoz de la Nava D.[8]
6-20-0
Michon A.
Zhang Z.
7-657-63
Zverev M.
Basilashvili N.[2]
6-24-67-66
Trungelliti M.
Safwat M.
4-66-36-4
Gimeno Traver D.
Langer N.
7-605-76-1
Kicker N.[9]
Pena Lopez M.
6-766-36-3
Melzer G.[3]
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Reuter Y.
Lenz J.
6-46-3
Lopez Perez E.
Gaio F.
6-26-4
Arnaboldi A.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-36-3
Satral J.
Kamke T.[7]
6-23-66-2
Kuzmanov D.
De Greef A.
6-37-610
Darcis S.[4]
Lapentti G.
6-27-64
Brands D.[6]
Nagal S.
6-43-67-5
Gombos N.
Jahn J.
6-06-3
Gigounon G.
Perez Sanz D.
6-16-1