Vasek Pospisil vs Damir Dzumhur — Nottingham Round of 32

Nottingham · ATP · Round of 32
CAN11
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 June 2016
grass
Damir Dzumhur
BIH
Damir Dzumhur
#108ATP
1638ELO
1554Grass ELO
$528kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLLW
Pospisil V.
6-1 6-4
Dzumhur D.
Pospisil V.
662
Dzumhur D.
140

Vasek Pospisil defeated Damir Dzumhur 6-1 6-4 in the Nottingham round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Vasek Pospisil came in defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Dzumhur D.

Dzumhur D.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Dzumhur D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
67%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
78%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
1.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Dzumhur D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
70
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
87
Break points won·Dominant
7
64
Deciding sets·Clear edge
62
80
Tiebreaks·Even
72
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Pospisil V.Dzumhur D.
Freshness·
—
76

Dzumhur D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[6]
Cuevas P.[2]
7-657-5
Semi-finals
Cuevas P.[2]
Muller G.[8]
3-67-636-4
Johnson S.[6]
Seppi A.[7]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Cuevas P.[2]
Baghdatis M.[9]
6-44-67-68
Muller G.[8]
Dolgopolov A.[4]
6-36-4
Seppi A.[7]
Sela D.
5-76-46-4
Johnson S.[6]
Anderson K.[1]
7-665-76-4
R16
Johnson S.[6]
Pospisil V.[11]
7-647-61
Cuevas P.[2]
Evans D.
6-747-656-4
Baghdatis M.[9]
Querrey S.[5]
1-67-686-4
Dolgopolov A.[4]
Dancevic F.
6-37-5
Muller G.[8]
Youzhny M.
6-747-646-3
Anderson K.[1]
Verdasco F.[14]
6-37-66
Sela D.
Becker B.
6-32-66-4
Seppi A.[7]
Mannarino A.
6-26-3
R32
Cuevas P.[2]
Robert S.
6-47-63
Evans D.
Berankis R.[16]
2-67-636-2
Querrey S.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-46-4
Dolgopolov A.[4]
Edmund K.
6-47-65
Muller G.[8]
Vesely J.
7-626-2
Seppi A.[7]
Jaziri M.
7-56-3
Mannarino A.
Lorenzi P.[12]
6-26-2
Becker B.
Pella G.[13]
3-66-16-3
Sela D.
Sousa J.[3]
6-37-63
Johnson S.[6]
Millman J.
6-26-2
Pospisil V.[11]
Dzumhur D.
6-16-4
Verdasco F.[14]
Estrella V.
6-14-66-3
Anderson K.[1]
Dodig I.
6-36-756-3
Baghdatis M.[9]
Donskoy E.
7-56-2
Youzhny M.
Carreno Busta P.[10]
6-16-4
Dancevic F.
Kukushkin M.[15]
4-67-647-62
R64
Robert S.
Klein B.
7-56-4
Evans D.
Broady L.
3-66-27-66
Donskoy E.
Kudla D.
6-46-4
Escobedo E.
Schwartzman D.
6-06-3
Edmund K.
Rosol L.
6-46-3
Dancevic F.
Ward A.
7-636-736-2
Youzhny M.
Gabashvili T.
4-66-36-3
Vesely J.
Zeballos H.
6-46-3
Jaziri M.
Ward J.
6-13-66-4
Mannarino A.
Fritz T.
6-36-2
Becker B.
Thompson J.
6-22-66-4
Sela D.
Hernych J.
4-66-36-2
Millman J.
Bellucci T.
7-642-66-2
Estrella V.
Ram R.
7-676-746-2
Dodig I.
Benneteau J.
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.
Istomin D.
1-67-646-4