Jordan Thompson vs John Patrick Smith — Surbiton CH Round of 16

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jordan Thompson
AUS2
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2016
grass
AUS
John Patrick Smith
37 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Thompson J.
2-6 7-6 6-3
Smith J.
Thompson J.
27762
Smith J.
66531

Jordan Thompson defeated John Patrick Smith 2-6 7-6 6-3 in the Surbiton CH round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — John Patrick Smith came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's quarter-final. Jordan Thompson claimed a first win over John Patrick Smith in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-07-11NewportR32grassJohn Patrick Smith6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Smith J.

Smith J.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Smith J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.3
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Smith J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
86
Break points won·Clear edge
24
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lu Y.[3]
Copil M.
7-57-611
Semi-finals
Lu Y.[3]
Thompson J.[2]
6-756-37-64
Copil M.
Fratangelo B.[4]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[2]
Brown D.[5]
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[4]
Tiafoe F.
6-36-4
Copil M.
Kamke T.
6-42-66-3
Lu Y.[3]
Saville L.
6-46-1
R16
Kamke T.
Myneni S.[8]
6-06-4
Thompson J.[2]
Smith J.
2-67-656-3
Brown D.[5]
Corrie E.
6-36-3
Lu Y.[3]
Nguyen D.
6-36-4
Saville L.
Broady L.
3-66-27-65
Tiafoe F.
Wu D.[7]
4-67-636-4
Fratangelo B.[4]
Omara J.
6-36-2
Copil M.
Evans D.[1]
6-46-2
R32
Smith J.
Klein B.
6-26-4
Brown D.[5]
Struvay E.
7-626-4
Nguyen D.
Mousley B.
7-55-76-1
Saville L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-47-66
Broady L.
Smyczek T.[6]
3-66-27-62
Wu D.[7]
Ward A.
6-17-65
Tiafoe F.
Zemlja G.
6-46-747-5
Omara J.
Li Z.
6-26-4
Fratangelo B.[4]
Glasspool L.
6-27-64
Myneni S.[8]
Duckworth J.
6-43-66-3
Copil M.
Milton J.
6-46-2
Evans D.[1]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-4
Kamke T.
Przysiezny M.
6-36-3
Lu Y.[3]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Thompson J.[2]
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-3
Corrie E.
Setkic A.
6-36-4