Zdenek Kolar vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Prague CH Qualifying Round 2

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Zdenek Kolar
CZE
Zdenek Kolar
#153ATP
1506ELO
1485Clay ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2016
clay
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Kolar Z.
6-2 6-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Kolar Z.
662
Van Rijthoven T.
220

Zdenek Kolar defeated Tim Van Rijthoven 6-2 6-2 in the Prague CH qualifying round 2 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zdenek Kolar came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kolar Z.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kolar Z.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.1
9.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kolar Z.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
26
Break points saved·Dominant
53
90
Break points won·Dominant
28
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
58
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kolar Z.Van Rijthoven T.
Freshness·
90
—

Kolar Z.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Kolar Z.
Molcan A.
6-35-76-4
Eremin E.
Beck A.[7]
7-656-4
Zhyrmont D.
Maden Y.
6-22-66-3
Hampel L.
Blasko M.
7-56-4
Q2
Molcan A.
Gomez L.
2-66-46-3
Hampel L.
Sonego L.[8]
7-646-747-5
Beck A.[7]
Haerteis J.
3-66-26-3
Zhyrmont D.
Barrientos N.[5]
3-66-37-64
Kolar Z.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-26-2
Eremin E.
Dlouhy L.
6-07-5
Maden Y.
Marterer M.[2]
6-26-3
Blasko M.
Brkic T.
7-686-3
Ursu V.[4]
Rosenholm P.[6]
4-66-27-64
Zelenay I.
Moser F.[7]
6-16-1
Vocel M.
Sekulic M.[8]
4-66-37-67
Hurkacz H.[1]
Appelgren D.[5]
6-16-777-65
Q1
Gomez L.
Yang T.[6]
6-16-2
Beck A.[7]
Mager G.
6-46-4
Hampel L.
Pavic A.
3-66-16-0
Kolar Z.
Polanka F.
6-06-2
Barrientos N.[5]
Papik T.
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Barbosa R.
7-6106-1
Eremin E.
Londero J.[3]
7-676-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Hernandez J.[4]
6-46-4
Haerteis J.
Nouza P.
6-26-0
Dlouhy L.
Arvidsson I.
4-67-646-3
Zhyrmont D.
Cuevas M.
6-13-66-3
Maden Y.
Styler O.
6-26-1
Marterer M.[2]
Duda F.
6-16-2
Sonego L.[8]
Diarra G.
6-16-2
Blasko M.
Simonsson F.
6-34-67-65
Brkic T.
Janvier M.[1]
4-66-46-4
Rosenholm P.[6]
Sproch D.
6-36-4
Ursu V.[4]
Surchenko D.
4-66-26-0
Moser F.[7]
Dlouhy L.
6-36-2
Zelenay I.
Bellier A.[3]
5-77-657-5
Sekulic M.[8]
Recek D.
7-666-4
Vocel M.
Arvidsson I.[2]
3-66-36-3
Appelgren D.[5]
Sonego L.
6-06-0
Hurkacz H.[1]
Bisko M.
6-36-1