Jordan Thompson vs Peter Gojowczyk — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jordan Thompson
AUS2
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2016
grass
GER
Peter Gojowczyk
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWLW
Thompson J.
6-2 6-3
Gojowczyk P.
Thompson J.
662
Gojowczyk P.
230

Jordan Thompson defeated Peter Gojowczyk 6-2 6-3 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Jordan Thompson came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-07-26AtlantaR16hardJordan Thompson7-6(6) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Gojowczyk P.

Gojowczyk P.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Gojowczyk P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.2
6.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.3
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Gojowczyk P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
70
61
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
89
Break points won·Slight edge
24
35
Deciding sets·Clear edge
91
75
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lu Y.[3]
Copil M.
7-57-611
Semi-finals
Lu Y.[3]
Thompson J.[2]
6-756-37-64
Copil M.
Fratangelo B.[4]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[2]
Brown D.[5]
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[4]
Tiafoe F.
6-36-4
Copil M.
Kamke T.
6-42-66-3
Lu Y.[3]
Saville L.
6-46-1
R16
Kamke T.
Myneni S.[8]
6-06-4
Thompson J.[2]
Smith J.
2-67-656-3
Brown D.[5]
Corrie E.
6-36-3
Lu Y.[3]
Nguyen D.
6-36-4
Saville L.
Broady L.
3-66-27-65
Tiafoe F.
Wu D.[7]
4-67-636-4
Fratangelo B.[4]
Omara J.
6-36-2
Copil M.
Evans D.[1]
6-46-2
R32
Smith J.
Klein B.
6-26-4
Brown D.[5]
Struvay E.
7-626-4
Nguyen D.
Mousley B.
7-55-76-1
Saville L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-47-66
Broady L.
Smyczek T.[6]
3-66-27-62
Wu D.[7]
Ward A.
6-17-65
Tiafoe F.
Zemlja G.
6-46-747-5
Omara J.
Li Z.
6-26-4
Fratangelo B.[4]
Glasspool L.
6-27-64
Myneni S.[8]
Duckworth J.
6-43-66-3
Copil M.
Milton J.
6-46-2
Evans D.[1]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-4
Kamke T.
Przysiezny M.
6-36-3
Lu Y.[3]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Thompson J.[2]
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-3
Corrie E.
Setkic A.
6-36-4