Marius Copil vs Tobias Kamke — Surbiton CH Quarter-final

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2016
grass
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Copil M.
6-4 2-6 6-3
Kamke T.
Copil M.
6262
Kamke T.
4631

Marius Copil defeated Tobias Kamke 6-4 2-6 6-3 in the Surbiton CH quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Marius Copil came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Marius Copil extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Marius Copil closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-02-13RotterdamQ1hardMarius Copil6-7(1) 7-6(3) 6-1
2012-04-23BucharestR32clayMarius Copil6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Kamke T.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Kamke T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
1.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Kamke T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
69
Break points won·Clear edge
3
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lu Y.[3]
Copil M.
7-57-611
Semi-finals
Lu Y.[3]
Thompson J.[2]
6-756-37-64
Copil M.
Fratangelo B.[4]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[2]
Brown D.[5]
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[4]
Tiafoe F.
6-36-4
Copil M.
Kamke T.
6-42-66-3
Lu Y.[3]
Saville L.
6-46-1
R16
Kamke T.
Myneni S.[8]
6-06-4
Thompson J.[2]
Smith J.
2-67-656-3
Brown D.[5]
Corrie E.
6-36-3
Lu Y.[3]
Nguyen D.
6-36-4
Saville L.
Broady L.
3-66-27-65
Tiafoe F.
Wu D.[7]
4-67-636-4
Fratangelo B.[4]
Omara J.
6-36-2
Copil M.
Evans D.[1]
6-46-2
R32
Smith J.
Klein B.
6-26-4
Brown D.[5]
Struvay E.
7-626-4
Nguyen D.
Mousley B.
7-55-76-1
Saville L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-47-66
Broady L.
Smyczek T.[6]
3-66-27-62
Wu D.[7]
Ward A.
6-17-65
Tiafoe F.
Zemlja G.
6-46-747-5
Omara J.
Li Z.
6-26-4
Fratangelo B.[4]
Glasspool L.
6-27-64
Myneni S.[8]
Duckworth J.
6-43-66-3
Copil M.
Milton J.
6-46-2
Evans D.[1]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-4
Kamke T.
Przysiezny M.
6-36-3
Lu Y.[3]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Thompson J.[2]
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-3
Corrie E.
Setkic A.
6-36-4