Sumit Nagal vs Kevin Krawietz — Rome CH Qualifying Final

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Final
Sumit Nagal
IND8
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 May 2016
clay
GER
Kevin Krawietz
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
Nagal S.
7-5 6-4
Krawietz K.
Nagal S.
762
Krawietz K.
540

Sumit Nagal defeated Kevin Krawietz 7-5 6-4 in the Rome CH qualifying final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Krawietz K.

Krawietz K.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Krawietz K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 174). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Krawietz K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
42
Break points saved·Even
69
71
Break points won·Clear edge
35
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
62
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
84
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Krawietz K.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Nedelko I.[3]
Uchiyama Y.[5]
6-37-63
Nagal S.[8]
Krawietz K.
7-56-4
Ferreira Silva F.[2]
Horansky F.[6]
6-26-4
Fucsovics M.[1]
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-4
Diarra G.[5]
Sancic A.
6-46-4
Ymer M.[6]
Stefanini J.
6-26-3
Janvier M.[2]
Ghedin R.[7]
6-16-2
Mager G.[1]
Capecchi D.[8]
6-46-2
Q2
Nagal S.[8]
Mosciatti M.
6-26-1
Nedelko I.[3]
Uzhylovsky V.
6-26-4
Krawietz K.
Pereira J.[4]
6-36-1
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Reyes Varela M.
6-06-4
Horansky F.[6]
Rodriguez C.
7-56-2
Ferreira Silva F.[2]
Giorgetti F.
6-06-2
Karlovskiy E.
Romboli F.[7]
6-27-5
Fucsovics M.[1]
Callahan H.
6-16-3
Ghedin R.[7]
Chiurulli D.
6-47-65
Sancic A.
Bortolotti M.[4]
4-66-26-4
Janvier M.[2]
Di Meo G.
7-56-2
Diarra G.[5]
Spinnato D.
6-26-0
Ymer M.[6]
Moroni G.
4-66-07-64
Stefanini J.
Rodriguez C.[3]
6-26-3
Capecchi D.[8]
Willekes Macdonald R.
6-06-3
Mager G.[1]
Petrone A.
6-26-4
Q1
Krawietz K.
Bessire F.
6-36-3
Nagal S.[8]
Del Prete A.
6-06-1
Reyes Varela M.
Bonadio R.
4-66-26-4
Uzhylovsky V.
De Santis G.
2-66-16-1
Rodriguez C.
Abbruciati L.
7-657-5
Giorgetti F.
Becuzzi E.
6-06-0
Mosciatti M.
Virgili A.
6-37-5
Karlovskiy E.
Marcan D.
6-16-0
Callahan H.
Camilli L.
6-06-0
Spinnato D.
Cortegiani A.
6-36-2
Sancic A.
Portaluri G.
7-627-61
Moroni G.
Marcan D.
6-36-1
Stefanini J.
Sorrentino L.
6-02-66-4