Marius Copil vs Adam Pavlasek — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 May 2016
clay
CZE4
Adam Pavlasek
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
Copil M.
4-6 7-5 6-4
Pavlasek A.
Copil M.
4762
Pavlasek A.
6541

Marius Copil defeated Adam Pavlasek 4-6 7-5 6-4 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Adam Pavlasek came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Pavlasek A.

Pavlasek A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Pavlasek A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
4.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Pavlasek A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
32
Break points saved·Dominant
91
64
Break points won·Dominant
3
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
26
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[2]
Krajinovic F.[5]
7-626-0
Satral J.
Haase R.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Krajinovic F.[5]
Vesely J.[1]
6-36-4
Edmund K.[2]
Volandri F.
6-16-4
Satral J.
Ymer M.
6-43-66-2
Haase R.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[2]
Rola B.
6-43-66-0
Volandri F.
Trungelliti M.
6-46-1
Krajinovic F.[5]
Pellegrino A.
6-32-66-4
Vesely J.[1]
Kamke T.
7-56-0
Ymer M.
Fucsovics M.[8]
4-66-37-5
Satral J.
Bedene A.[3]
6-46-4
Lamasine T.
Ymer E.
2-66-26-3
Haase R.[1]
Martin A.[5]
6-16-3
R16
Edmund K.[2]
Krawietz K.
6-36-4
Rola B.
De Schepper K.[7]
6-16-0
Volandri F.
Copil M.
7-56-4
Krajinovic F.[5]
Nagal S.
5-76-36-2
Trungelliti M.
Paul T.
6-16-4
Pellegrino A.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-37-61
Kamke T.
Millot V.[8]
6-746-16-4
Vesely J.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-17-63
Lamasine T.
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
6-737-634-2
Ymer M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-41-67-66
Fucsovics M.[8]
Mager G.
6-06-3
Bedene A.[3]
Gaio F.
6-04-66-2
Satral J.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[7]
3-66-36-2
Ymer E.
Volandri F.
7-57-61
Martin A.[5]
Garin C.
6-47-63
Haase R.[1]
Pontoglio D.
6-26-2
R32
Paul T.
Fucsovics M.
6-05-76-4
Trungelliti M.
Thompson J.[6]
6-46-4
Edmund K.[2]
Zopp J.
6-46-3
Krawietz K.
Michon A.
2-66-46-1
De Schepper K.[7]
Naso G.
6-27-5
Copil M.
Pavlasek A.[4]
4-67-56-4
Volandri F.
Li Z.
6-26-0
Nagal S.
Moriya H.
5-76-36-1
Rola B.
Saville L.
6-26-1
Krajinovic F.[5]
Ungur A.
3-66-06-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Nedelko I.
6-46-0
Pellegrino A.
Zeballos H.[3]
6-44-66-4
Millot V.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Bai Y.
6-26-2
Napolitano S.
Bonacia F.
3-67-56-2
Vesely J.[1]
Ilhan M.
7-56-2
Arnaboldi A.
Pavlasek A.[2]
7-636-4
Ymer M.
Janvier M.
6-46-2
Fucsovics M.[8]
Bourgue M.
6-36-3
Mager G.
Quinzi G.
6-37-5
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[7]
Michon A.
6-47-64
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
Diarra G.
7-676-4
Garin C.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Pontoglio D.
Trinker B.
4-66-06-2
Haase R.[1]
Diez S.
4-66-36-3
Bedene A.[3]
Cecchinato M.
6-16-1
Gaio F.
Pellegrino A.
6-13-66-2
Satral J.
Giustino L.
6-06-4
Volandri F.
De Bakker T.[6]
6-26-3
Ymer E.
Ungur A.
2-66-36-4
Lamasine T.
Novak D.
6-36-4
Martin A.[5]
Djere L.
6-31-66-4