Daniel Nguyen vs Ti Chen — Busan CH Round of 32

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 May 2016
hard
TPE
Ti Chen
42 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
Nguyen D.
6-3 6-4
Chen T.
Nguyen D.
662
Chen T.
340

Daniel Nguyen defeated Ti Chen 6-3 6-4 in the Busan CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Daniel Nguyen came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Nguyen closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nguyen D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Chen T.

Chen T.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Serve advantage — Nguyen D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nguyen D.Chen T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
56%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (103 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nguyen D.Chen T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
21
14
Break points saved·Even
37
39
Break points won·Even
22
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
39
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
23
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kravchuk K.
Evans D.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Evans D.
Millman J.[2]
6-36-3
Kravchuk K.
Zemlja G.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Kravchuk K.
Matosevic M.
6-747-50-0
Millman J.[2]
Broady L.
6-06-0
Evans D.
Sugita Y.[7]
6-26-3
Zemlja G.
Chiudinelli M.
6-43-66-3
R16
Evans D.
Nam J.
6-36-2
Sugita Y.[7]
Lee D.
4-67-6106-0
Matosevic M.
Smith J.
3-66-36-3
Millman J.[2]
Stakhovsky S.
2-66-46-2
Broady L.
Nguyen D.
6-37-5
Kravchuk K.
Wang J.
6-47-5
Zemlja G.
Lacko L.[6]
0-67-56-3
Chiudinelli M.
Sarkissian A.
4-66-36-3
R32
Millman J.[2]
Krajicek A.
6-10-0
Zemlja G.
Kwon S.
7-647-65
Sarkissian A.
Berankis R.[1]
6-23-0
Nguyen D.
Chen T.
6-36-4
Kravchuk K.
Chung H.[4]
6-36-3
Stakhovsky S.
Zhang Z.
4-66-26-3
Broady L.
Berrer M.[8]
6-14-66-3
Nam J.
Groth S.[3]
6-737-647-5
Evans D.
Kudryavtsev A.
6-36-1
Lee D.
Soeda G.
3-66-47-65
Sugita Y.[7]
Wu D.
3-67-56-4
Matosevic M.
Ito T.[5]
6-36-3
Smith J.
Przysiezny M.
6-36-1
Wang J.
Barton M.
6-16-4
Lacko L.[6]
Hong S.
4-66-46-2
Chiudinelli M.
Oh C.
6-36-2