Amir Weintraub vs Go Soeda — Taipei CH Round of 32

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ISR
Amir Weintraub
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2016
hard
JPN7
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Weintraub A.
7-6 7-5
Soeda G.
Weintraub A.
7772
Soeda G.
6450

Amir Weintraub defeated Go Soeda 7-6 7-5 in the Taipei CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Amir Weintraub came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Amir Weintraub extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-09-14Davis Cup WG PO: JPN vs ISRRRhardAmir Weintraub6-3 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Weintraub A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Weintraub A.

Serve advantage — Soeda G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Weintraub A.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (53 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Weintraub A.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
45
61
Break points won·Clear edge
29
14
Deciding sets·Slight edge
35
46
Tiebreaks·Dominant
60
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[6]
Kravchuk K.[8]
3-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Kravchuk K.[8]
Broady L.
6-26-4
Evans D.[6]
Berankis R.[1]
6-37-65
Quarter-finals
Broady L.
Weintraub A.
7-56-3
Kravchuk K.[8]
Ito T.[3]
3-66-16-2
Evans D.[6]
Matosevic M.
6-37-5
Berankis R.[1]
Stakhovsky S.[5]
6-47-5
R16
Matosevic M.
Kudryavtsev A.
7-646-1
Broady L.
Kibi Y.
6-26-4
Weintraub A.
Nielsen F.
6-33-67-62
Ito T.[3]
Chiudinelli M.
6-26-3
Kravchuk K.[8]
Nguyen D.
6-36-726-4
Berankis R.[1]
Mitchell B.
7-56-4
Evans D.[6]
Wang J.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Jung J.
6-26-3
R32
Ito T.[3]
Yu C.
6-46-4
Nielsen F.
Sekiguchi S.
7-667-66
Wang J.
Chen T.
6-46-2
Mitchell B.
Yi C.
6-27-63
Broady L.
Hung J.
6-46-0
Weintraub A.
Soeda G.[7]
7-647-5
Chiudinelli M.
Wu D.
6-16-1
Nguyen D.
Huang L.
6-26-2
Jung J.
Yang T.
6-46-1
Kibi Y.
Groth S.[2]
1-67-626-4
Kravchuk K.[8]
Barton M.
7-666-3
Evans D.[6]
Kelly D.
6-17-65
Matosevic M.
Wu T.
6-36-1
Kudryavtsev A.
Sugita Y.[4]
6-26-746-1
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Przysiezny M.
6-777-56-1
Berankis R.[1]
Saville L.
6-26-3