Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Michal Przysiezny — Taipei CH Round of 32

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
UKR5
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2016
hard
POL
Michal Przysiezny
42 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Stakhovsky S.
6-7 7-5 6-1
Przysiezny M.
Stakhovsky S.
67762
Przysiezny M.
79511

Sergiy Stakhovsky defeated Michal Przysiezny 6-7 7-5 6-1 in the Taipei CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Michal Przysiezny came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Sergiy Stakhovsky claimed a first win over Michal Przysiezny in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-07-17Davis Cup G1 R2: POL vs UKRRRhardMichal Przysiezny7-6(5) 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Stakhovsky S.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Przysiezny M.

Przysiezny M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stakhovsky S.Przysiezny M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.3
8.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stakhovsky S.Przysiezny M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
40
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
79
Break points won·Clear edge
3
16
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
38
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
59
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[6]
Kravchuk K.[8]
3-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Kravchuk K.[8]
Broady L.
6-26-4
Evans D.[6]
Berankis R.[1]
6-37-65
Quarter-finals
Broady L.
Weintraub A.
7-56-3
Kravchuk K.[8]
Ito T.[3]
3-66-16-2
Evans D.[6]
Matosevic M.
6-37-5
Berankis R.[1]
Stakhovsky S.[5]
6-47-5
R16
Matosevic M.
Kudryavtsev A.
7-646-1
Broady L.
Kibi Y.
6-26-4
Weintraub A.
Nielsen F.
6-33-67-62
Ito T.[3]
Chiudinelli M.
6-26-3
Kravchuk K.[8]
Nguyen D.
6-36-726-4
Berankis R.[1]
Mitchell B.
7-56-4
Evans D.[6]
Wang J.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Jung J.
6-26-3
R32
Ito T.[3]
Yu C.
6-46-4
Nielsen F.
Sekiguchi S.
7-667-66
Wang J.
Chen T.
6-46-2
Mitchell B.
Yi C.
6-27-63
Broady L.
Hung J.
6-46-0
Weintraub A.
Soeda G.[7]
7-647-5
Chiudinelli M.
Wu D.
6-16-1
Nguyen D.
Huang L.
6-26-2
Jung J.
Yang T.
6-46-1
Kibi Y.
Groth S.[2]
1-67-626-4
Kravchuk K.[8]
Barton M.
7-666-3
Evans D.[6]
Kelly D.
6-17-65
Matosevic M.
Wu T.
6-36-1
Kudryavtsev A.
Sugita Y.[4]
6-26-746-1
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Przysiezny M.
6-777-56-1
Berankis R.[1]
Saville L.
6-26-3