Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Ons Jabeur — Rabat Round of 32

Rabat · WTA · Round of 32
Sara Sorribes Tormo
ESP
Sara Sorribes Tormo
#212WTA
1664ELO
1651Clay ELO
29 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2016
clay
TUN
Ons Jabeur
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-0 6-2
Jabeur O.
Sorribes Tormo S.
662
Jabeur O.
020

Sara Sorribes Tormo defeated Ons Jabeur 6-0 6-2 in the Rabat round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sara Sorribes Tormo came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Sara Sorribes Tormo extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-03-22MiamiR16hardSara Sorribes Tormo6-4 0-6 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Sorribes Tormo S.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Jabeur O.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Sorribes Tormo S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sorribes Tormo S.Jabeur O.
1st serve in·Clear edge
71%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
57%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sorribes Tormo S.Jabeur O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
90
Break points saved·Dominant
19
90
Break points won·Even
99
96
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sorribes Tormo S.Jabeur O.
Freshness·
84
—

Sorribes Tormo S.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°CPartly cloudy
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 57%

Draw

Final
Bacsinszky T.[1]
Erakovic M.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Bacsinszky T.[1]
Babos T.[5]
6-47-5
Erakovic M.
Bertens K.
2-67-677-5
Quarter-finals
Erakovic M.
Krunic A.
6-46-4
Bertens K.
Putintseva Y.[8]
6-36-746-3
Babos T.[5]
Parmentier P.
6-36-3
Bacsinszky T.[1]
Larsson J.
6-46-1
R16
Erakovic M.
Tsurenko L.[7]
6-40-0
Larsson J.
Pereira T.
6-46-4
Bacsinszky T.[1]
Baindl K.
6-32-66-3
Krunic A.
Makarova K.[2]
6-26-2
Bertens K.
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-46-3
Babos T.[5]
Robson L.
6-16-2
Putintseva Y.[8]
Maria T.
6-06-2
Parmentier P.
Hogenkamp R.
4-67-56-2
R32
Makarova K.[2]
Dulgheru A.
6-46-2
Krunic A.
Sevastova A.
6-36-2
Hogenkamp R.
Begu I.[4]
6-36-4
Larsson J.
Vekic D.
6-26-2
Tsurenko L.[7]
Soler Espinosa S.
6-46-0
Sorribes Tormo S.
Jabeur O.
6-06-2
Maria T.
Rodionova A.
6-16-4
Putintseva Y.[8]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-37-61
Pereira T.
Beck A.[6]
6-36-1
Robson L.
Benhadi G.
6-16-1
Erakovic M.
Mitu C.
6-26-3
Bertens K.
Schmiedlova A.[3]
6-06-1
Babos T.[5]
Hercog P.
6-36-786-1
Parmentier P.
Flipkens K.
7-57-5
Baindl K.
Kanepi K.
7-56-1
Bacsinszky T.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-46-2