Daniel Evans vs Jimmy Wang — Taipei CH Round of 16

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Daniel Evans
GBR6
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2016
hard
TPE
Jimmy Wang
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Evans D.
6-4 6-3
Wang J.
Evans D.
662
Wang J.
430

Daniel Evans defeated Jimmy Wang 6-4 6-3 in the Taipei CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jimmy Wang came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 16. Daniel Evans claimed a first win over Jimmy Wang in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Evans closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-08-25US OpenQ1hardJimmy Wang4-6 7-6(9) 6-2
2014-03-19Miami MastersQ2hardJimmy Wang6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Evans D.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Wang J.

Wang J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Serve advantage — Wang J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Evans D.Wang J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Evans D.Wang J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
73
36
Break points saved·Dominant
97
55
Break points won·Dominant
61
33
Deciding sets·Clear edge
82
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Evans D.Wang J.
Freshness·
100
—

Evans D.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[6]
Kravchuk K.[8]
3-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Kravchuk K.[8]
Broady L.
6-26-4
Evans D.[6]
Berankis R.[1]
6-37-65
Quarter-finals
Broady L.
Weintraub A.
7-56-3
Kravchuk K.[8]
Ito T.[3]
3-66-16-2
Evans D.[6]
Matosevic M.
6-37-5
Berankis R.[1]
Stakhovsky S.[5]
6-47-5
R16
Matosevic M.
Kudryavtsev A.
7-646-1
Broady L.
Kibi Y.
6-26-4
Weintraub A.
Nielsen F.
6-33-67-62
Ito T.[3]
Chiudinelli M.
6-26-3
Kravchuk K.[8]
Nguyen D.
6-36-726-4
Berankis R.[1]
Mitchell B.
7-56-4
Evans D.[6]
Wang J.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Jung J.
6-26-3
R32
Ito T.[3]
Yu C.
6-46-4
Nielsen F.
Sekiguchi S.
7-667-66
Wang J.
Chen T.
6-46-2
Mitchell B.
Yi C.
6-27-63
Broady L.
Hung J.
6-46-0
Weintraub A.
Soeda G.[7]
7-647-5
Chiudinelli M.
Wu D.
6-16-1
Nguyen D.
Huang L.
6-26-2
Jung J.
Yang T.
6-46-1
Kibi Y.
Groth S.[2]
1-67-626-4
Kravchuk K.[8]
Barton M.
7-666-3
Evans D.[6]
Kelly D.
6-17-65
Matosevic M.
Wu T.
6-36-1
Kudryavtsev A.
Sugita Y.[4]
6-26-746-1
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Przysiezny M.
6-777-56-1
Berankis R.[1]
Saville L.
6-26-3