Richel Hogenkamp vs Irina Camelia Begu — Rabat Round of 32

Rabat · WTA · Round of 32
NED
Richel Hogenkamp
34 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2016
clay
Irina Camelia Begu
ROU4
Irina Camelia Begu
#204WTA
1769ELO
1733Clay ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLLW
Hogenkamp R.
6-3 6-4
Begu I.
Hogenkamp R.
662
Begu I.
340

Richel Hogenkamp defeated Irina Camelia Begu 6-3 6-4 in the Rabat round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hogenkamp R.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Begu I.

Begu I.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Hogenkamp R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hogenkamp R.Begu I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
46%
Service points won·Even
54%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
51%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hogenkamp R.Begu I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
68
Break points saved·Dominant
14
58
Break points won·Dominant
63
88
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
16
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Hogenkamp R.Begu I.
Freshness·
—
98

Begu I.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°CPartly cloudy
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 57%

Draw

Final
Bacsinszky T.[1]
Erakovic M.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Bacsinszky T.[1]
Babos T.[5]
6-47-5
Erakovic M.
Bertens K.
2-67-677-5
Quarter-finals
Erakovic M.
Krunic A.
6-46-4
Bertens K.
Putintseva Y.[8]
6-36-746-3
Babos T.[5]
Parmentier P.
6-36-3
Bacsinszky T.[1]
Larsson J.
6-46-1
R16
Erakovic M.
Tsurenko L.[7]
6-40-0
Larsson J.
Pereira T.
6-46-4
Bacsinszky T.[1]
Baindl K.
6-32-66-3
Krunic A.
Makarova K.[2]
6-26-2
Bertens K.
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-46-3
Babos T.[5]
Robson L.
6-16-2
Putintseva Y.[8]
Maria T.
6-06-2
Parmentier P.
Hogenkamp R.
4-67-56-2
R32
Makarova K.[2]
Dulgheru A.
6-46-2
Krunic A.
Sevastova A.
6-36-2
Hogenkamp R.
Begu I.[4]
6-36-4
Larsson J.
Vekic D.
6-26-2
Tsurenko L.[7]
Soler Espinosa S.
6-46-0
Sorribes Tormo S.
Jabeur O.
6-06-2
Maria T.
Rodionova A.
6-16-4
Putintseva Y.[8]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-37-61
Pereira T.
Beck A.[6]
6-36-1
Robson L.
Benhadi G.
6-16-1
Erakovic M.
Mitu C.
6-26-3
Bertens K.
Schmiedlova A.[3]
6-06-1
Babos T.[5]
Hercog P.
6-36-786-1
Parmentier P.
Flipkens K.
7-57-5
Baindl K.
Kanepi K.
7-56-1
Bacsinszky T.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-46-2