Christian Lindell vs Joao Pedro Sorgi — Sao Paulo CH Round of 32

Sao Paulo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SWE7
Christian Lindell
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2016
clay
BRA
Joao Pedro Sorgi
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWW
Lindell C.
6-1 6-2
Sorgi J.
Lindell C.
662
Sorgi J.
120

Christian Lindell defeated Joao Pedro Sorgi 6-1 6-2 in the Sao Paulo CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Christian Lindell came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's final. Christian Lindell extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-02-09Sao PauloQ1clayChristian Lindell6-0 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Lindell C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Sorgi J.

Sorgi J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Lindell C.

Serve advantage — Sorgi J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lindell C.Sorgi J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 118). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lindell C.Sorgi J.
Clutch Rating·Even
17
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
54
42
Break points won·Slight edge
20
31
Deciding sets·Even
34
34
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
21
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lama G.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Escobedo E.
Lindell C.[7]
7-53-66-3
Lama G.[5]
Monteiro T.[4]
5-76-46-2
Quarter-finals
Lindell C.[7]
Pereira J.
6-27-64
Monteiro T.[4]
Bortolotti M.
6-13-66-1
Lama G.[5]
Londero J.
1-67-667-5
Escobedo E.
Arevalo M.[6]
7-686-1
R16
Monteiro T.[4]
Gomez E.
6-46-3
Arevalo M.[6]
Zampieri C.
7-647-64
Bortolotti M.
Estevez M.[8]
6-04-65-2
Escobedo E.
Souza J.[2]
6-42-67-5
Pereira J.
Coria F.
6-36-2
Lindell C.[7]
Zormann Da Silva M.
6-37-5
Lama G.[5]
Severino C.
6-36-2
Londero J.
Escobar G.
6-16-4
R32
Escobedo E.
Mena F.
6-36-1
Lindell C.[7]
Sorgi J.
6-16-2
Estevez M.[8]
Galarza J.
7-646-3
Bortolotti M.
Saez J.
4-66-46-3
Severino C.
Decamps G.
6-36-2
Escobar G.
Collarini A.
7-53-66-4
Londero J.
Ghem A.[1]
6-12-67-5
Coria F.
Clezar G.[3]
6-30-0
Pereira J.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-26-3
Zampieri C.
Miele A.
7-666-716-2
Arevalo M.[6]
Hocevar R.
6-26-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Velotti A.
6-37-5
Lama G.[5]
Galan D.
6-26-3
Souza J.[2]
Tsuchiya A.
6-26-0
Zormann Da Silva M.
Leite W.
6-36-4
Gomez E.
Camilo R.
6-27-5