Juan Ignacio Londero vs Andre Ghem — Sao Paulo CH Round of 32

Sao Paulo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Juan Ignacio Londero
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2016
clay
BRA1
Andre Ghem
44 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWWLLL
Londero J.
6-1 2-6 7-5
Ghem A.
Londero J.
6272
Ghem A.
1651

Juan Ignacio Londero defeated Andre Ghem 6-1 2-6 7-5 in the Sao Paulo CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Andre Ghem came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. Juan Ignacio Londero claimed a first win over Andre Ghem in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Juan Ignacio Londero came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 2–6 7–5.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-02-02QuitoQ3clayAndre Ghem6-3 5-7 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Londero J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ghem A.

Ghem A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Londero J.

Serve advantage — Londero J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Londero J.Ghem A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Londero J.Ghem A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
8
Break points saved·Dominant
82
56
Break points won·Clear edge
30
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
23
10
Tiebreaks·Even
23
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lama G.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Escobedo E.
Lindell C.[7]
7-53-66-3
Lama G.[5]
Monteiro T.[4]
5-76-46-2
Quarter-finals
Lindell C.[7]
Pereira J.
6-27-64
Monteiro T.[4]
Bortolotti M.
6-13-66-1
Lama G.[5]
Londero J.
1-67-667-5
Escobedo E.
Arevalo M.[6]
7-686-1
R16
Monteiro T.[4]
Gomez E.
6-46-3
Arevalo M.[6]
Zampieri C.
7-647-64
Bortolotti M.
Estevez M.[8]
6-04-65-2
Escobedo E.
Souza J.[2]
6-42-67-5
Pereira J.
Coria F.
6-36-2
Lindell C.[7]
Zormann Da Silva M.
6-37-5
Lama G.[5]
Severino C.
6-36-2
Londero J.
Escobar G.
6-16-4
R32
Escobedo E.
Mena F.
6-36-1
Lindell C.[7]
Sorgi J.
6-16-2
Estevez M.[8]
Galarza J.
7-646-3
Bortolotti M.
Saez J.
4-66-46-3
Severino C.
Decamps G.
6-36-2
Escobar G.
Collarini A.
7-53-66-4
Londero J.
Ghem A.[1]
6-12-67-5
Coria F.
Clezar G.[3]
6-30-0
Pereira J.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-26-3
Zampieri C.
Miele A.
7-666-716-2
Arevalo M.[6]
Hocevar R.
6-26-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Velotti A.
6-37-5
Lama G.[5]
Galan D.
6-26-3
Souza J.[2]
Tsuchiya A.
6-26-0
Zormann Da Silva M.
Leite W.
6-36-4
Gomez E.
Camilo R.
6-27-5