Angelique Kerber vs Simona HalepFed Cup WG R1: GER vs ROU Round Robin

Fed Cup WG R1: GER vs ROU · WTA · Round Robin
38 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Saturday, 16 April 2016
clay
34 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWW
Kerber A.
6-2 6-2
Halep S.
Kerber A.
662
Halep S.
220

Angelique Kerber defeated Simona Halep 6-2 6-2 in the Fed Cup WG R1: GER vs ROU round robin on clay. Angelique Kerber extended the head-to-head to 6–5.

Key context

Head to head

55
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-05-10RomeR32clayAngelique Kerber1-6 3-3 RET
2019-06-24EastbourneQFgrassAngelique Kerber6-4 6-3
2018-05-28Roland GarrosQFclaySimona Halep6-7(2) 6-3 6-2
2018-01-15Australian OpenSFhardSimona Halep6-3 4-6 9-7
2016-10-24SingaporeRRhardAngelique Kerber6-4 6-2
2016-08-15CincinnatiSFhardAngelique Kerber6-3 6-4
2016-07-25MontrealSFhardSimona Halep6-0 3-6 6-2
2016-06-27WimbledonQFgrassAngelique Kerber7-5 7-6(2)
2015-08-10TorontoR16hardSimona Halep6-3 5-7 6-4
2014-02-10DohaFhardSimona Halep6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Kerber A.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Halep S.

Halep S.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kerber A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
65%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
45%
48%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
87
89
Break points saved·Even
91
87
Break points won·Slight edge
95
100
Deciding sets·Clear edge
86
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About