Mirjana Lucic vs Shuai Peng — Charleston Round of 64

Charleston · WTA · Round of 64
CRO
Mirjana Lucic
44 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2016
clay
CHN
Shuai Peng
40 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Lucic M.
6-2 6-1
Peng S.
Lucic M.
662
Peng S.
210

Mirjana Lucic defeated Shuai Peng 6-2 6-1 in the Charleston round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Shuai Peng came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Mirjana Lucic claimed a first win over Shuai Peng in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-08-21New HavenR16hardShuai Peng6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Lucic M.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Peng S.

Peng S.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Lucic M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lucic M.Peng S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
42%
47%
Service points won·Even
55%
57%
Return points won·Even
46%
44%
Break points saved·Even
53%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
1.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (87 vs 132). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lucic M.Peng S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
28
37
Break points saved·Slight edge
45
52
Break points won·Slight edge
79
74
Deciding sets·Even
43
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
20°CClear
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 49%

Draw

Final
Stephens S.[7]
Vesnina E.
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Stephens S.[7]
Kerber A.[1]
6-13-0
Vesnina E.
Errani S.[5]
6-44-66-2
Quarter-finals
Stephens S.[7]
Kasatkina D.[14]
6-15-77-5
Vesnina E.
Siegemund L.
7-56-4
Errani S.[5]
Putintseva Y.
7-626-1
Kerber A.[1]
Begu I.
6-26-3
R16
Putintseva Y.
Williams V.[3]
7-652-66-4
Errani S.[5]
Stosur S.[10]
6-47-65
Stephens S.[7]
Saville D.[12]
6-46-3
Vesnina E.
Dominguez Lino L.
6-16-3
Kasatkina D.[14]
Chirico L.
6-06-4
Begu I.
Puig M.
1-66-27-64
Kerber A.[1]
Kucova K.
6-26-3
Siegemund L.
Lucic M.
7-56-2
R32
Dominguez Lino L.
Bouchard E.
6-41-61-0
Siegemund L.
Keys M.[8]
6-736-46-4
Stosur S.[10]
Cepelova J.
6-47-5
Chirico L.
Safarova L.[4]
6-36-3
Puig M.
Petkovic A.[6]
7-56-2
Begu I.
Mattek Sands B.
6-44-66-2
Kucova K.
Bondarenko K.
0-66-36-3
Kerber A.[1]
Arruabarrena L.
6-25-77-63
Vesnina E.
Bencic B.[2]
6-16-1
Williams V.[3]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.[14]
Konjuh A.
6-16-1
Lucic M.
Mladenovic K.[11]
4-66-47-613
Putintseva Y.
Lisicki S.[15]
7-54-66-3
Errani S.[5]
Shvedova Y.
6-06-3
Stephens S.[7]
Kovinic D.
6-46-3
Saville D.[12]
Zhang S.
6-46-0
R64
Vesnina E.
Burger C.
7-56-2
Putintseva Y.
Nara K.
7-646-0
Lisicki S.[15]
Falconi I.
6-46-3
Zhang S.
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-2
Puig M.
Hradecka L.
6-36-2
Siegemund L.
Tig P.
4-66-36-3
Saville D.[12]
Diyas Z.
6-11-66-3
Konjuh A.
Karatantcheva S.
6-36-3
Bondarenko K.
Doi M.[16]
4-66-36-1
Lucic M.
Peng S.
6-26-1
Riske Amritraj A.
Altick F.
6-36-2
Cepelova J.
Sevastova A.
4-66-46-1
Kovinic D.
Buyukakcay C.
6-16-3
Kasatkina D.[14]
Zheng S.
6-26-1
Bouchard E.
Dulgheru A.
6-36-4
Mladenovic K.[11]
Maria T.
6-46-3
Stosur S.[10]
Krunic A.
6-46-4
Shvedova Y.
Rodina E.
6-16-1
Chirico L.
Osaka N.
3-66-16-1
Arruabarrena L.
Rogers S.
6-43-66-4
Dominguez Lino L.
Mchale C.
2-66-46-1
Mattek Sands B.
Pereira T.
5-76-36-2
Begu I.
Garcia C.
6-42-67-63
Kucova K.
Brengle M.
7-56-2