Laura Siegemund vs Madison Keys — Charleston Round of 32
Charleston · WTA · Round of 32
#87WTA
1769ELO
1692Clay ELO
$736kYTD
$8.8MCAREER
38 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2016
clay
USA8#23WTA
1987ELO
1894Clay ELO
$1.1MYTD
$24MCAREER
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWL
Siegemund L.6-7 6-4 6-4
Keys M.
Siegemund L.
63662
Keys M.
77441
Laura Siegemund defeated Madison Keys 6-7 6-4 6-4 in the Charleston round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Madison Keys came in ranked #23, leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending last year's final. Laura Siegemund narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.
Key context
- Match story: Laura Siegemund dropped the opening set before beating Madison Keys 6–7 6–4 6–4.
Head to head
1–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-27 | Montreal | R64 | hard | Madison Keys | 6-2 6-1 |
| 2025-06-30 | Wimbledon | R32 | grass | Laura Siegemund | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2016-06-27 | Wimbledon | R128 | grass | Madison Keys | 6-3 6-1 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Keys M.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
73%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
61%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.8
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
64
94
Break points saved·Clear edge
80
96
Break points won·Even
89
90
Deciding sets·Clear edge
76
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
33
96
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Freshness
Recent loadFreshness·Clear edge
98
84
Siegemund L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Keys M.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
20°CClear
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 49%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Stephens S.[7]
Kasatkina D.[14]
6-15-77-5
Vesnina E.
Siegemund L.
7-56-4
Errani S.[5]
Putintseva Y.
7-626-1
Kerber A.[1]
Begu I.
6-26-3
R16
Putintseva Y.
Williams V.[3]
7-652-66-4
Errani S.[5]
Stosur S.[10]
6-47-65
Stephens S.[7]
Saville D.[12]
6-46-3
Vesnina E.
Dominguez Lino L.
6-16-3
Kasatkina D.[14]
Chirico L.
6-06-4
Begu I.
Puig M.
1-66-27-64
Kerber A.[1]
Kucova K.
6-26-3
Siegemund L.
Lucic M.
7-56-2
R32
Dominguez Lino L.
Bouchard E.
6-41-61-0
Siegemund L.
Keys M.[8]
6-736-46-4
Stosur S.[10]
Cepelova J.
6-47-5
Chirico L.
Safarova L.[4]
6-36-3
Puig M.
Petkovic A.[6]
7-56-2
Begu I.
Mattek Sands B.
6-44-66-2
Kucova K.
Bondarenko K.
0-66-36-3
Kerber A.[1]
Arruabarrena L.
6-25-77-63
Vesnina E.
Bencic B.[2]
6-16-1
Williams V.[3]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.[14]
Konjuh A.
6-16-1
Lucic M.
Mladenovic K.[11]
4-66-47-613
Putintseva Y.
Lisicki S.[15]
7-54-66-3
Errani S.[5]
Shvedova Y.
6-06-3
Stephens S.[7]
Kovinic D.
6-46-3
Saville D.[12]
Zhang S.
6-46-0
R64
Vesnina E.
Burger C.
7-56-2
Putintseva Y.
Nara K.
7-646-0
Lisicki S.[15]
Falconi I.
6-46-3
Zhang S.
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-2
Puig M.
Hradecka L.
6-36-2
Siegemund L.
Tig P.
4-66-36-3
Saville D.[12]
Diyas Z.
6-11-66-3
Konjuh A.
Karatantcheva S.
6-36-3
Bondarenko K.
Doi M.[16]
4-66-36-1
Lucic M.
Peng S.
6-26-1
Riske Amritraj A.
Altick F.
6-36-2
Cepelova J.
Sevastova A.
4-66-46-1
Kovinic D.
Buyukakcay C.
6-16-3
Kasatkina D.[14]
Zheng S.
6-26-1
Bouchard E.
Dulgheru A.
6-36-4
Mladenovic K.[11]
Maria T.
6-46-3
Stosur S.[10]
Krunic A.
6-46-4
Shvedova Y.
Rodina E.
6-16-1
Chirico L.
Osaka N.
3-66-16-1
Arruabarrena L.
Rogers S.
6-43-66-4
Dominguez Lino L.
Mchale C.
2-66-46-1
Mattek Sands B.
Pereira T.
5-76-36-2
Begu I.
Garcia C.
6-42-67-63
Kucova K.
Brengle M.
7-56-2