Tatsuma Ito vs Andre Ghem — Le Gosier CH Round of 16

Le Gosier CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
JPN5
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2016
hard
BRA
Andre Ghem
44 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWWLLL
Ito T.
7-6 6-2
Ghem A.
Ito T.
7762
Ghem A.
6220

Tatsuma Ito defeated Andre Ghem 7-6 6-2 in the Le Gosier CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tatsuma Ito extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatsuma Ito closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-06-23WimbledonQ2grassTatsuma Ito7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ghem A.

Ghem A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Ghem A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Ghem A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
8
Break points saved·Slight edge
61
56
Break points won·Slight edge
9
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Jaziri M.[3]
Kozlov S.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.
Nishioka Y.[6]
3-67-56-3
Jaziri M.[3]
Fritz T.[2]
6-756-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[2]
Ito T.[5]
6-736-46-4
Jaziri M.[3]
Monteiro T.
6-24-67-5
Kozlov S.
Millot V.
5-77-56-2
Nishioka Y.[6]
Ram R.[1]
6-26-2
R16
Nishioka Y.[6]
Hurkacz H.
6-06-2
Kozlov S.
Lestienne C.
6-23-66-1
Fritz T.[2]
Lama G.
6-796-47-610
Ito T.[5]
Ghem A.
7-626-2
Jaziri M.[3]
Arevalo M.
6-46-4
Monteiro T.
Jasika O.
6-46-746-3
Millot V.
Gonzalez A.[7]
6-24-67-65
Ram R.[1]
Mina G.
3-66-36-2
R32
Mina G.
Auger Aliassime F.
2-66-33-1
Nishioka Y.[6]
Krueger M.
7-57-62
Fritz T.[2]
Mertens Y.
6-46-3
Lama G.
Montero J.
7-56-4
Ito T.[5]
Dubail J.
6-26-756-4
Arevalo M.
Jacq G.
7-646-4
Jasika O.
Souza J.
6-17-66
Millot V.
Janvier M.
6-43-66-2
Ghem A.
Bester P.
6-47-60
Jaziri M.[3]
Michalicka M.
6-26-4
Monteiro T.
Smith J.[8]
6-737-57-67
Gonzalez A.[7]
Polansky P.
6-37-5
Lestienne C.
Puget A.
7-646-776-1
Kozlov S.
Krajicek A.[4]
6-36-4
Hurkacz H.
Milojevic N.
6-46-756-4
Ram R.[1]
Gomez E.
6-47-65