Taylor Fritz vs Tatsuma Ito — Le Gosier CH Quarter-final

Le Gosier CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Taylor Fritz
USA2
Taylor Fritz
#10ATP
1909ELO
1839Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2016
hard
JPN5
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Fritz T.
6-7 6-4 6-4
Ito T.
Fritz T.
63662
Ito T.
77441

Taylor Fritz defeated Tatsuma Ito 6-7 6-4 6-4 in the Le Gosier CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fritz T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Ito T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fritz T.Ito T.
76
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fritz T.Ito T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.5
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fritz T.Ito T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
24
Break points saved·Dominant
100
61
Break points won·Dominant
60
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
43
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fritz T.Ito T.
Freshness·
76
—

Fritz T.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Jaziri M.[3]
Kozlov S.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.
Nishioka Y.[6]
3-67-56-3
Jaziri M.[3]
Fritz T.[2]
6-756-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[2]
Ito T.[5]
6-736-46-4
Jaziri M.[3]
Monteiro T.
6-24-67-5
Kozlov S.
Millot V.
5-77-56-2
Nishioka Y.[6]
Ram R.[1]
6-26-2
R16
Nishioka Y.[6]
Hurkacz H.
6-06-2
Kozlov S.
Lestienne C.
6-23-66-1
Fritz T.[2]
Lama G.
6-796-47-610
Ito T.[5]
Ghem A.
7-626-2
Jaziri M.[3]
Arevalo M.
6-46-4
Monteiro T.
Jasika O.
6-46-746-3
Millot V.
Gonzalez A.[7]
6-24-67-65
Ram R.[1]
Mina G.
3-66-36-2
R32
Mina G.
Auger Aliassime F.
2-66-33-1
Nishioka Y.[6]
Krueger M.
7-57-62
Fritz T.[2]
Mertens Y.
6-46-3
Lama G.
Montero J.
7-56-4
Ito T.[5]
Dubail J.
6-26-756-4
Arevalo M.
Jacq G.
7-646-4
Jasika O.
Souza J.
6-17-66
Millot V.
Janvier M.
6-43-66-2
Ghem A.
Bester P.
6-47-60
Jaziri M.[3]
Michalicka M.
6-26-4
Monteiro T.
Smith J.[8]
6-737-57-67
Gonzalez A.[7]
Polansky P.
6-37-5
Lestienne C.
Puget A.
7-646-776-1
Kozlov S.
Krajicek A.[4]
6-36-4
Hurkacz H.
Milojevic N.
6-46-756-4
Ram R.[1]
Gomez E.
6-47-65