Sara Errani vs Samantha Stosur — Charleston Round of 16
Charleston · WTA · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2016
clay
Errani S.6-4 7-6
Stosur S.
Errani S.
6772
Stosur S.
4650
Sara Errani defeated Samantha Stosur 6-4 7-6 in the Charleston round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Samantha Stosur came in leading the head-to-head 6–2, defending last year's round of 32. Sara Errani narrowed the head-to-head to 6–3.
Key context
- Match story: Sara Errani edged Samantha Stosur in two tight sets (6–4 7–6).
Head to head
2–6| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-08-31 | US Open | R32 | hard | Samantha Stosur | 7-5 2-6 6-1 |
| 2012-10-22 | WTA Championships | RR | hard | Sara Errani | 6-3 2-6 6-0 |
| 2012-05-28 | Roland Garros | SF | clay | Sara Errani | 7-5 1-6 6-3 |
| 2012-05-14 | Rome | R32 | clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2011-02-14 | Dubai | R32 | hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-0 6-1 |
| 2010-08-30 | US Open | R32 | hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2010-08-23 | New Haven | R16 | hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-1 3-6 7-6(4) |
| 2008-08-11 | Olympics | R64 | hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-3 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Clear edge
78%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
55%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
42%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
52%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
48%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
49%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.3
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
4.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
20°CClear
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 49%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Stephens S.[7]
Kasatkina D.[14]
6-15-77-5
Vesnina E.
Siegemund L.
7-56-4
Errani S.[5]
Putintseva Y.
7-626-1
Kerber A.[1]
Begu I.
6-26-3
R16
Putintseva Y.
Williams V.[3]
7-652-66-4
Errani S.[5]
Stosur S.[10]
6-47-65
Stephens S.[7]
Saville D.[12]
6-46-3
Vesnina E.
Dominguez Lino L.
6-16-3
Kasatkina D.[14]
Chirico L.
6-06-4
Begu I.
Puig M.
1-66-27-64
Kerber A.[1]
Kucova K.
6-26-3
Siegemund L.
Lucic M.
7-56-2
R32
Dominguez Lino L.
Bouchard E.
6-41-61-0
Siegemund L.
Keys M.[8]
6-736-46-4
Stosur S.[10]
Cepelova J.
6-47-5
Chirico L.
Safarova L.[4]
6-36-3
Puig M.
Petkovic A.[6]
7-56-2
Begu I.
Mattek Sands B.
6-44-66-2
Kucova K.
Bondarenko K.
0-66-36-3
Kerber A.[1]
Arruabarrena L.
6-25-77-63
Vesnina E.
Bencic B.[2]
6-16-1
Williams V.[3]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.[14]
Konjuh A.
6-16-1
Lucic M.
Mladenovic K.[11]
4-66-47-613
Putintseva Y.
Lisicki S.[15]
7-54-66-3
Errani S.[5]
Shvedova Y.
6-06-3
Stephens S.[7]
Kovinic D.
6-46-3
Saville D.[12]
Zhang S.
6-46-0
R64
Vesnina E.
Burger C.
7-56-2
Putintseva Y.
Nara K.
7-646-0
Lisicki S.[15]
Falconi I.
6-46-3
Zhang S.
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-2
Puig M.
Hradecka L.
6-36-2
Siegemund L.
Tig P.
4-66-36-3
Saville D.[12]
Diyas Z.
6-11-66-3
Konjuh A.
Karatantcheva S.
6-36-3
Bondarenko K.
Doi M.[16]
4-66-36-1
Lucic M.
Peng S.
6-26-1
Riske Amritraj A.
Altick F.
6-36-2
Cepelova J.
Sevastova A.
4-66-46-1
Kovinic D.
Buyukakcay C.
6-16-3
Kasatkina D.[14]
Zheng S.
6-26-1
Bouchard E.
Dulgheru A.
6-36-4
Mladenovic K.[11]
Maria T.
6-46-3
Stosur S.[10]
Krunic A.
6-46-4
Shvedova Y.
Rodina E.
6-16-1
Chirico L.
Osaka N.
3-66-16-1
Arruabarrena L.
Rogers S.
6-43-66-4
Dominguez Lino L.
Mchale C.
2-66-46-1
Mattek Sands B.
Pereira T.
5-76-36-2
Begu I.
Garcia C.
6-42-67-63
Kucova K.
Brengle M.
7-56-2