Marius Copil vs Dimitar Kuzmanov — Napoli CH Round of 32

Napoli CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2016
clay
Dimitar Kuzmanov
BUL
Dimitar Kuzmanov
#394ATP
1431ELO
1394Clay ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
Copil M.
6-3 4-6 6-2
Kuzmanov D.
Copil M.
6462
Kuzmanov D.
3621

Marius Copil defeated Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-3 4-6 6-2 in the Napoli CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Marius Copil came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Marius Copil extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Marius Copil closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-28WimbledonQ1grassMarius Copil6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kuzmanov D.

Kuzmanov D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Kuzmanov D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Kuzmanov D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
16
Break points saved·Dominant
91
61
Break points won·Dominant
3
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Copil M.Kuzmanov D.
Freshness·
—
57

Kuzmanov D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 71 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kovalik J.
De Greef A.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Kovalik J.
Elias G.[6]
6-16-766-3
De Greef A.
Copil M.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Copil M.
Caruso S.
6-06-2
De Greef A.
Carballes Baena R.[5]
7-626-3
Kovalik J.
Volandri F.
6-46-746-2
Elias G.[6]
Ignatik U.
6-26-2
R16
Copil M.
Mager G.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Dutra Silva R.[2]
7-666-4
Volandri F.
Naso G.
7-54-66-1
Ignatik U.
Ungur A.
7-56-2
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Giannessi A.
6-25-76-3
De Greef A.
Krajinovic F.[1]
6-47-5
Caruso S.
Basic M.[8]
6-46-776-2
Elias G.[6]
Napolitano S.
7-56-2
R32
Copil M.
Kuzmanov D.
6-34-66-2
Dutra Silva R.[2]
Golubev A.
6-16-0
Kovalik J.
Fucsovics M.
6-36-0
Naso G.
Vatutin A.
6-47-5
Volandri F.
Martin A.[7]
6-16-3
Ignatik U.
Fabbiano T.[4]
6-46-717-5
Ungur A.
Sidorenko A.
6-47-66
Napolitano S.
Donati M.
6-36-756-2
Elias G.[6]
Sijsling I.
4-66-26-1
Basic M.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
7-54-66-4
Caruso S.
Cipolla F.
6-16-3
Mager G.
Struff J.[3]
7-644-66-4
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Gaio F.
3-66-26-3
Giannessi A.
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-06-2
De Greef A.
Vanni L.
7-56-4
Krajinovic F.[1]
Reister J.
5-76-46-2