Louisa Chirico vs Naomi Osaka — Charleston Round of 64

Charleston · WTA · Round of 64
Louisa Chirico
USA
Louisa Chirico
#382WTA
1476ELO
1516Clay ELO
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2016
clay
Naomi Osaka
JPN
Naomi Osaka
#13WTA
1987ELO
1886Clay ELO
$1.1MYTD
$26MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
Chirico L.
3-6 6-1 6-1
Osaka N.
Chirico L.
3662
Osaka N.
6111

Louisa Chirico defeated Naomi Osaka 3-6 6-1 6-1 in the Charleston round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Naomi Osaka came in ranked #13.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chirico L.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Osaka N.

Osaka N.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Chirico L.

Serve advantage — Osaka N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chirico L.Osaka N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
62%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
54%
63%
Return points won·Even
44%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.1
6.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 196). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chirico L.Osaka N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
28
91
Break points saved·Dominant
46
96
Break points won·Clear edge
74
97
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
99
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
83
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Chirico L.Osaka N.
Freshness·
—
85

Osaka N.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
20°CClear
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 49%

Draw

Final
Stephens S.[7]
Vesnina E.
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Stephens S.[7]
Kerber A.[1]
6-13-0
Vesnina E.
Errani S.[5]
6-44-66-2
Quarter-finals
Stephens S.[7]
Kasatkina D.[14]
6-15-77-5
Vesnina E.
Siegemund L.
7-56-4
Errani S.[5]
Putintseva Y.
7-626-1
Kerber A.[1]
Begu I.
6-26-3
R16
Putintseva Y.
Williams V.[3]
7-652-66-4
Errani S.[5]
Stosur S.[10]
6-47-65
Stephens S.[7]
Saville D.[12]
6-46-3
Vesnina E.
Dominguez Lino L.
6-16-3
Kasatkina D.[14]
Chirico L.
6-06-4
Begu I.
Puig M.
1-66-27-64
Kerber A.[1]
Kucova K.
6-26-3
Siegemund L.
Lucic M.
7-56-2
R32
Dominguez Lino L.
Bouchard E.
6-41-61-0
Siegemund L.
Keys M.[8]
6-736-46-4
Stosur S.[10]
Cepelova J.
6-47-5
Chirico L.
Safarova L.[4]
6-36-3
Puig M.
Petkovic A.[6]
7-56-2
Begu I.
Mattek Sands B.
6-44-66-2
Kucova K.
Bondarenko K.
0-66-36-3
Kerber A.[1]
Arruabarrena L.
6-25-77-63
Vesnina E.
Bencic B.[2]
6-16-1
Williams V.[3]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.[14]
Konjuh A.
6-16-1
Lucic M.
Mladenovic K.[11]
4-66-47-613
Putintseva Y.
Lisicki S.[15]
7-54-66-3
Errani S.[5]
Shvedova Y.
6-06-3
Stephens S.[7]
Kovinic D.
6-46-3
Saville D.[12]
Zhang S.
6-46-0
R64
Vesnina E.
Burger C.
7-56-2
Putintseva Y.
Nara K.
7-646-0
Lisicki S.[15]
Falconi I.
6-46-3
Zhang S.
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-2
Puig M.
Hradecka L.
6-36-2
Siegemund L.
Tig P.
4-66-36-3
Saville D.[12]
Diyas Z.
6-11-66-3
Konjuh A.
Karatantcheva S.
6-36-3
Bondarenko K.
Doi M.[16]
4-66-36-1
Lucic M.
Peng S.
6-26-1
Riske Amritraj A.
Altick F.
6-36-2
Cepelova J.
Sevastova A.
4-66-46-1
Kovinic D.
Buyukakcay C.
6-16-3
Kasatkina D.[14]
Zheng S.
6-26-1
Bouchard E.
Dulgheru A.
6-36-4
Mladenovic K.[11]
Maria T.
6-46-3
Stosur S.[10]
Krunic A.
6-46-4
Shvedova Y.
Rodina E.
6-16-1
Chirico L.
Osaka N.
3-66-16-1
Arruabarrena L.
Rogers S.
6-43-66-4
Dominguez Lino L.
Mchale C.
2-66-46-1
Mattek Sands B.
Pereira T.
5-76-36-2
Begu I.
Garcia C.
6-42-67-63
Kucova K.
Brengle M.
7-56-2