Hiroki Moriya vs Kimmer Coppejans — Shenzhen CH Round of 32

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Hiroki Moriya
JPN
Hiroki Moriya
#472ATP
1353ELO
1321Hard ELO
35 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 March 2016
hard
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL7
Kimmer Coppejans
#222ATP
1544ELO
1469Hard ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
Moriya H.
6-2 6-2
Coppejans K.
Moriya H.
662
Coppejans K.
220

Hiroki Moriya defeated Kimmer Coppejans 6-2 6-2 in the Shenzhen CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kimmer Coppejans came in ranked #222, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moriya H.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Coppejans K.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Moriya H.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Moriya H.Coppejans K.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moriya H.Coppejans K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
1
44
Break points saved·Dominant
35
67
Break points won·Clear edge
9
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
29
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Moriya H.Coppejans K.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
68

Moriya H.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 49 games (7d) · Coppejans K.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sela D.[2]
Wu D.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Wu D.
Fabbiano T.
6-21-67-66
Sela D.[2]
Pavlasek A.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Sela D.[2]
Gojowczyk P.
6-46-1
Pavlasek A.
Myneni S.
6-36-1
Wu D.
Ilhan M.
7-656-4
Fabbiano T.
Thompson J.[8]
6-37-5
R16
Sela D.[2]
Desein N.
6-36-2
Pavlasek A.
Li Z.
6-46-3
Myneni S.
Soeda G.
6-36-1
Wu D.
Galovic V.
6-46-3
Ilhan M.
Moriya H.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Satral J.
7-56-2
Fabbiano T.
Saville L.
6-36-4
Gojowczyk P.
Basilashvili N.[6]
6-36-4
R32
Sela D.[2]
Lopez Perez E.
6-46-3
Desein N.
Langer N.
6-736-46-4
Gojowczyk P.
Qi X.
6-06-4
Basilashvili N.[6]
Skugor F.
2-66-16-4
Li Z.
Gimeno Traver D.[3]
6-36-746-1
Pavlasek A.
Wang C.
7-616-1
Myneni S.
Lacko L.[5]
7-56-3
Moriya H.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-26-2
Ilhan M.
Chiudinelli M.
3-66-47-5
Galovic V.
Rola B.
7-634-66-4
Wu D.
Krajinovic F.[4]
6-46-1
Thompson J.[8]
Zhang Z.
7-56-4
Satral J.
Kudryavtsev A.
6-27-5
Saville L.
Chen L.
6-06-4
Fabbiano T.
Daniel T.[1]
4-66-06-3
Soeda G.
Sun F.
6-46-2