Franko Skugor vs Thomas Fabbiano — Guangzhou CH Round of 16

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CRO
Franko Skugor
38 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2016
hard
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Skugor F.
6-4 6-3
Fabbiano T.
Skugor F.
662
Fabbiano T.
430

Franko Skugor defeated Thomas Fabbiano 6-4 6-3 in the Guangzhou CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Thomas Fabbiano came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Franko Skugor claimed a first win over Thomas Fabbiano in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Franko Skugor closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-06-26EastbourneR32grassThomas Fabbiano7-6(5) 6-4
2016-07-18UmagR32clayThomas Fabbiano6-0 4-1 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Skugor F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Skugor F.

Serve advantage — Skugor F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Skugor F.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.1
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Skugor F.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
35
28
Break points saved·Even
80
81
Break points won·Even
16
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
28
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
33
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Basilashvili N.[7]
Lacko L.[5]
6-16-767-5
Semi-finals
Basilashvili N.[7]
Sela D.[2]
6-756-42-0
Lacko L.[5]
Zhang Z.
6-06-1
Quarter-finals
Sela D.[2]
Soeda G.
4-66-26-3
Basilashvili N.[7]
Skugor F.
6-776-46-2
Lacko L.[5]
Ilhan M.
4-66-36-4
Zhang Z.
Li Z.
6-26-4
R16
Ilhan M.
Pavlasek A.
3-67-676-2
Sela D.[2]
Wu D.
6-26-0
Soeda G.
Coppejans K.[8]
6-36-1
Skugor F.
Fabbiano T.
6-46-3
Basilashvili N.[7]
Chiudinelli M.
7-56-0
Lacko L.[5]
Langer N.
6-36-4
Zhang Z.
Myneni S.
4-67-656-2
Li Z.
Bhambri Y.[6]
4-1
R32
Sela D.[2]
Moriya H.
6-41-67-5
Wu D.
Thompson J.
6-36-2
Soeda G.
Wang C.
6-36-3
Coppejans K.[8]
Wang J.
6-26-2
Fabbiano T.
Krajinovic F.[4]
7-626-4
Chiudinelli M.
Copil M.
6-06-2
Lacko L.[5]
Neuchrist M.
6-26-2
Langer N.
Celikbilek A.
6-26-2
Ilhan M.
Gojowczyk P.
1-66-36-3
Pavlasek A.
Gimeno Traver D.[3]
6-36-3
Bhambri Y.[6]
Sonego L.
6-16-1
Li Z.
Kudryavtsev A.
6-16-756-1
Zhang Z.
Saville L.
7-56-3
Myneni S.
Daniel T.[1]
1-66-07-5
Skugor F.
Bai Y.
6-31-0
Basilashvili N.[7]
Rola B.
5-77-56-4