Lorenzo Sonego vs Niels Desein — Guangzhou CH Qualifying Round 2

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Lorenzo Sonego
ITA
Lorenzo Sonego
#83ATP
1719ELO
1702Hard ELO
$435kYTD
$9.8MCAREER
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWLWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2016
hard
BEL
Niels Desein
39 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWWWW
Sonego L.
6-3 6-2
Desein N.
Sonego L.
662
Desein N.
320

Lorenzo Sonego defeated Niels Desein 6-3 6-2 in the Guangzhou CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sonego L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Desein N.

Desein N.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Sonego L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Sonego L.Desein N.
41
Serve
—
38
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sonego L.Desein N.
1st serve in·Even
67%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
55%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
5.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 27). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sonego L.Desein N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
16
Break points saved·Dominant
99
52
Break points won·Clear edge
45
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
71
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sonego L.Desein N.
Freshness·
70
—

Sonego L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Neuchrist M.
Lopez Perez E.
6-43-67-64
Sonego L.
Fucsovics M.[3]
6-16-4
Copil M.[2]
Lee D.[6]
2-66-46-3
Wang J.
Smirnov A.[8]
6-37-67
Q2
Wang J.
Singh S.
4-66-36-4
Neuchrist M.
Jebavy R.
6-16-3
Lopez Perez E.
Wu Y.
6-46-2
Sonego L.
Desein N.
6-36-2
Fucsovics M.[3]
Nedunchezhiyan J.
6-46-2
Lee D.[6]
Krawietz K.
6-777-57-64
Copil M.[2]
Zhou S.
6-04-0
Smirnov A.[8]
Eremin E.
7-646-3
Q1
Smirnov A.[8]
Wang A.
4-66-16-4
Sonego L.
Kushakov A.
5-76-36-3
Neuchrist M.
Xia H.
6-36-1
Fucsovics M.[3]
Galovic V.
6-36-2
Zhou S.
Qi X.
6-47-64
Lee D.[6]
Kim C.
6-06-4
Jebavy R.
Molchanov D.[5]
6-37-5
Wu Y.
Sun F.
6-42-66-3
Lopez Perez E.
Satral J.[4]
4-66-36-4
Desein N.
Chen T.[7]
6-26-2
Nedunchezhiyan J.
Xia Z.
7-616-3
Krawietz K.
Ghedin R.
6-46-2
Copil M.[2]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-46-3
Eremin E.
Chen L.
6-36-3
Wang J.
Duan J.
6-26-1
Singh S.
Weintraub A.[1]
6-27-5