Yuki Bhambri vs Lorenzo Sonego — Guangzhou CH Round of 32

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
IND6
Yuki Bhambri
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 March 2016
hard
Lorenzo Sonego
ITA
Lorenzo Sonego
#83ATP
1719ELO
1702Hard ELO
$435kYTD
$9.8MCAREER
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWLWLLWL
Bhambri Y.
6-1 6-1
Sonego L.
Bhambri Y.
662
Sonego L.
110

Yuki Bhambri defeated Lorenzo Sonego 6-1 6-1 in the Guangzhou CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bhambri Y.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sonego L.

Sonego L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Bhambri Y.

Serve advantage — Bhambri Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bhambri Y.Sonego L.
—
Serve
41
—
Return
38

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bhambri Y.Sonego L.
1st serve in·Even
65%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.2
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bhambri Y.Sonego L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
69
Break points saved·Dominant
73
99
Break points won·Even
49
45
Deciding sets·Slight edge
63
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
53
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bhambri Y.Sonego L.
Freshness·
—
70

Sonego L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Basilashvili N.[7]
Lacko L.[5]
6-16-767-5
Semi-finals
Basilashvili N.[7]
Sela D.[2]
6-756-42-0
Lacko L.[5]
Zhang Z.
6-06-1
Quarter-finals
Sela D.[2]
Soeda G.
4-66-26-3
Basilashvili N.[7]
Skugor F.
6-776-46-2
Lacko L.[5]
Ilhan M.
4-66-36-4
Zhang Z.
Li Z.
6-26-4
R16
Ilhan M.
Pavlasek A.
3-67-676-2
Sela D.[2]
Wu D.
6-26-0
Soeda G.
Coppejans K.[8]
6-36-1
Skugor F.
Fabbiano T.
6-46-3
Basilashvili N.[7]
Chiudinelli M.
7-56-0
Lacko L.[5]
Langer N.
6-36-4
Zhang Z.
Myneni S.
4-67-656-2
Li Z.
Bhambri Y.[6]
4-1
R32
Sela D.[2]
Moriya H.
6-41-67-5
Wu D.
Thompson J.
6-36-2
Soeda G.
Wang C.
6-36-3
Coppejans K.[8]
Wang J.
6-26-2
Fabbiano T.
Krajinovic F.[4]
7-626-4
Chiudinelli M.
Copil M.
6-06-2
Lacko L.[5]
Neuchrist M.
6-26-2
Langer N.
Celikbilek A.
6-26-2
Ilhan M.
Gojowczyk P.
1-66-36-3
Pavlasek A.
Gimeno Traver D.[3]
6-36-3
Bhambri Y.[6]
Sonego L.
6-16-1
Li Z.
Kudryavtsev A.
6-16-756-1
Zhang Z.
Saville L.
7-56-3
Myneni S.
Daniel T.[1]
1-66-07-5
Skugor F.
Bai Y.
6-31-0
Basilashvili N.[7]
Rola B.
5-77-56-4