Dominic Thiem vs Joao SousaDavis Cup G1 R1: POR vs AUT Round Robin

Davis Cup G1 R1: POR vs AUT · ATP · Round Robin
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
3 — 0
Sets
Friday, 4 March 2016
hard
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Thiem D.
6-2 6-4 6-2
Sousa J.
Thiem D.
6663
Sousa J.
2420

Dominic Thiem defeated Joao Sousa 6-2 6-4 6-2 in the Davis Cup G1 R1: POR vs AUT round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Dominic Thiem came in leading the head-to-head 6–1. Dominic Thiem extended the head-to-head to 7–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Dominic Thiem closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–4 6–2.

Head to head

61
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-10-10GijonR32hardDominic Thiem6-2 6-0
2016-06-13HalleR32grassDominic Thiem7-5 6-4
2016-05-09Rome MastersR32clayDominic Thiem6-3 6-2
2015-09-21St. PetersburgSFcarpetJoao Sousa6-4 7-6(5)
2015-07-20UmagFclayDominic Thiem6-4 6-1
2015-02-16MarseilleR32hardDominic Thiem7-6(6) 6-4
2014-01-13Australian OpenR128hardDominic Thiem5-7 6-4 6-3 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Thiem D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Sousa J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Thiem D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.2
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
85
35
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
91
Break points won·Dominant
58
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
48
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About