Andrey Rublev vs Sergiy Stakhovsky — Quimper CH Semi-final

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
—
Sets
Walkover
Monday, 29 February 2016
hard
UKR2
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Rublev A.
vs
Stakhovsky S.

Andrey Rublev advanced past Sergiy Stakhovsky via walkover in the Quimper CH semi-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Stakhovsky S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rublev A.Stakhovsky S.
55
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Stakhovsky S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.9
7.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Stakhovsky S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
40
Break points saved·Clear edge
100
88
Break points won·Dominant
72
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Stakhovsky S.
Freshness·
100
—

Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rublev A.
Mathieu P.[1]
6-766-46-4
Semi-finals
Rublev A.
Stakhovsky S.[2]
W/O
Mathieu P.[1]
Mektic N.
6-41-66-1
Quarter-finals
Mathieu P.[1]
Sijsling I.
7-50-0
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Jouan R.
6-46-736-1
Rublev A.
Lacko L.[4]
6-43-67-65
Mektic N.
Kamke T.
2-67-656-4
R16
Lacko L.[4]
Hemery C.
6-20-0
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Sidorenko A.
6-47-63
Jouan R.
Ward J.
6-46-4
Rublev A.
Khachanov K.[8]
7-6107-5
Mektic N.
Guez D.
6-46-2
Kamke T.
Struff J.[3]
6-37-5
Sijsling I.
Dustov F.
6-16-4
Mathieu P.[1]
Setkic A.
2-67-666-3
R32
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Karatsev A.
7-697-66
Khachanov K.[8]
Lamasine T.
6-47-67
Struff J.[3]
Gaio F.
6-46-1
Sidorenko A.
Ignatik U.
6-24-66-2
Ward J.
Caruso S.
6-46-4
Jouan R.
Pavlasek A.[6]
6-46-3
Lacko L.[4]
Teixeira M.
7-56-4
Hemery C.
Tabatruong M.
6-21-66-2
Rublev A.
Olivetti A.
6-47-69
Mektic N.
Halys Q.
6-36-2
Guez D.
Lestienne C.
6-15-76-4
Kamke T.
Trungelliti M.
7-56-1
Dustov F.
De Schepper K.[7]
7-644-66-3
Sijsling I.
Arnaboldi A.
7-633-66-2
Setkic A.
Barrere G.
3-67-636-4
Mathieu P.[1]
Millot V.
6-16-2