Marinko Matosevic vs Marco Trungelliti — Dallas CH Round of 16

Dallas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Marinko Matosevic
40 yrs · 194 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 February 2016
hard
Marco Trungelliti
ARG
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1496Hard ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWW
Matosevic M.
6-4 6-3
Trungelliti M.
Matosevic M.
662
Trungelliti M.
430

Marinko Matosevic defeated Marco Trungelliti 6-4 6-3 in the Dallas CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Matosevic M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Trungelliti M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Matosevic M.

Serve advantage — Matosevic M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Matosevic M.Trungelliti M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Matosevic M.Trungelliti M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
39
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
87
Break points won·Slight edge
35
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
87
Tiebreaks·Even
18
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Matosevic M.Trungelliti M.
Freshness·
—
89

Trungelliti M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[2]
Evans D.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[2]
Smyczek T.[4]
7-56-3
Evans D.
Ito T.[6]
6-24-66-1
Quarter-finals
Ito T.[6]
Tiafoe F.
3-67-56-4
Edmund K.[2]
Zemlja G.
7-56-1
Smyczek T.[4]
Matosevic M.
7-644-66-3
Evans D.
Becker B.[3]
6-16-4
R16
Edmund K.[2]
Mcgee J.
6-36-4
Zemlja G.
Smith J.[7]
4-66-36-4
Smyczek T.[4]
Harrison R.
6-05-76-4
Matosevic M.
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Evans D.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-26-3
Becker B.[3]
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Ito T.[6]
Laaksonen H.
6-27-65
Tiafoe F.
Vaks M.
6-46-4
R32
Zemlja G.
Jung J.
6-44-67-65
Fratangelo B.[8]
Donaldson J.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Thompson C.
6-37-66
Ito T.[6]
Molchanov D.
6-26-757-66
Laaksonen H.
Michalicka M.
7-56-1
Vaks M.
Smith C.
6-46-2
Smyczek T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-46-3
Evans D.
Rublev A.
5-76-46-3
Becker B.[3]
Andersen J.
6-46-3
Edmund K.[2]
Bangoura S.
7-646-2
Mcgee J.
Novikov D.
5-76-16-4
Smith J.[7]
Quigley E.
7-666-3
Harrison R.
Kuznetsov A.
2-67-57-5
Trungelliti M.
Barrientos N.
6-37-66
Matosevic M.
Albot R.[5]
6-44-66-4
Tiafoe F.
Groth S.[1]
6-36-3