Daniel Evans vs Tatsuma Ito — Dallas CH Semi-final

Dallas CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Daniel Evans
GBR
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 February 2016
hard
JPN6
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Evans D.
6-2 4-6 6-1
Ito T.
Evans D.
6462
Ito T.
2611

Daniel Evans defeated Tatsuma Ito 6-2 4-6 6-1 in the Dallas CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Daniel Evans came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Daniel Evans extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Evans came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–2 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-03-18Miami MastersQ1hardDaniel Evans7-5 6-1
2019-01-14Australian OpenR128hardDaniel Evans7-5 6-1 7-6(8)

Serve vs return

This season
Evans D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Ito T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Evans D.Ito T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Evans D.Ito T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
73
24
Break points saved·Dominant
97
61
Break points won·Dominant
61
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
43
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Evans D.Ito T.
Freshness·
100
—

Evans D.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[2]
Evans D.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[2]
Smyczek T.[4]
7-56-3
Evans D.
Ito T.[6]
6-24-66-1
Quarter-finals
Ito T.[6]
Tiafoe F.
3-67-56-4
Edmund K.[2]
Zemlja G.
7-56-1
Smyczek T.[4]
Matosevic M.
7-644-66-3
Evans D.
Becker B.[3]
6-16-4
R16
Edmund K.[2]
Mcgee J.
6-36-4
Zemlja G.
Smith J.[7]
4-66-36-4
Smyczek T.[4]
Harrison R.
6-05-76-4
Matosevic M.
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Evans D.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-26-3
Becker B.[3]
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Ito T.[6]
Laaksonen H.
6-27-65
Tiafoe F.
Vaks M.
6-46-4
R32
Zemlja G.
Jung J.
6-44-67-65
Fratangelo B.[8]
Donaldson J.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Thompson C.
6-37-66
Ito T.[6]
Molchanov D.
6-26-757-66
Laaksonen H.
Michalicka M.
7-56-1
Vaks M.
Smith C.
6-46-2
Smyczek T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-46-3
Evans D.
Rublev A.
5-76-46-3
Becker B.[3]
Andersen J.
6-46-3
Edmund K.[2]
Bangoura S.
7-646-2
Mcgee J.
Novikov D.
5-76-16-4
Smith J.[7]
Quigley E.
7-666-3
Harrison R.
Kuznetsov A.
2-67-57-5
Trungelliti M.
Barrientos N.
6-37-66
Matosevic M.
Albot R.[5]
6-44-66-4
Tiafoe F.
Groth S.[1]
6-36-3