Jordi Samper Montana vs Tommy Paul — Bucaramanga CH Round of 32

Bucaramanga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP
Jordi Samper Montana
36 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 January 2016
clay
Tommy Paul
USA
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1886Clay ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Samper Montana J.
6-3 6-3
Paul T.
Samper Montana J.
662
Paul T.
330

Jordi Samper Montana defeated Tommy Paul 6-3 6-3 in the Bucaramanga CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jordi Samper Montana came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Samper Montana J.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Paul T.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Samper Montana J.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Samper Montana J.Paul T.
—
Serve
33
—
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Samper Montana J.Paul T.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
65%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.9
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Samper Montana J.Paul T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
18
93
Break points saved·Dominant
20
99
Break points won·Dominant
41
87
Deciding sets·Dominant
50
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Samper Montana J.Paul T.
Freshness·
—
91

Paul T.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Melzer G.
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Lorenzi P.[2]
Zeballos H.[7]
6-35-76-3
Melzer G.
Bourgue M.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Melzer G.
Struvay E.
6-47-65
Bourgue M.
Estrella V.[1]
6-17-65
Zeballos H.[7]
Samper Montana J.
6-37-64
Lorenzi P.[2]
Elias G.[8]
6-43-67-66
R16
Lorenzi P.[2]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-2
Elias G.[8]
Clezar G.
2-66-46-4
Samper Montana J.
Kicker N.
6-727-56-4
Zeballos H.[7]
Arguello F.
6-33-66-4
Melzer G.
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-43-66-2
Struvay E.
Trinker B.
6-46-1
Estrella V.[1]
Hernandez J.
6-34-67-5
Bourgue M.
Cachin P.
6-46-3
R32
Lorenzi P.[2]
Martin A.
6-32-66-3
Andreozzi G.
Hemery C.
6-36-2
Arguello F.
Barrientos N.
7-51-0
Melzer G.
Estevez M.
3-67-56-1
Struvay E.
Gonzalez A.
3-67-56-3
Trinker B.
Montanes A.[4]
6-736-46-4
Cachin P.
Falla A.[6]
7-606-3
Bourgue M.
Riba P.
6-46-3
Hernandez J.
Galan D.
6-26-3
Estrella V.[1]
De Greef A.
7-656-3
Clezar G.
Lapentti G.
6-27-5
Elias G.[8]
Lindell C.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Bagnis F.[3]
6-34-67-68
Samper Montana J.
Paul T.
6-36-3
Zeballos H.[7]
Jarry N.
7-617-5
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Dutra Silva R.[5]
6-46-4