Nicolas Kicker vs Facundo Bagnis — Bucaramanga CH Round of 32

Bucaramanga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 January 2016
clay
ARG3
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Kicker N.
6-3 4-6 7-6
Bagnis F.
Kicker N.
647102
Bagnis F.
36681

Nicolas Kicker defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-3 4-6 7-6 in the Bucaramanga CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's semi-final. Nicolas Kicker claimed a first win over Facundo Bagnis in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Nicolas Kicker closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 7–6.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-22CordobaR32clayFacundo Bagnis6-1 6-4
2016-02-22Sao PauloQ1clayFacundo Bagnis5-7 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Kicker N.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kicker N.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.3
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kicker N.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
54
Break points saved·Dominant
56
92
Break points won·Slight edge
45
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
30
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kicker N.Bagnis F.
Freshness·
100
—

Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Melzer G.
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Lorenzi P.[2]
Zeballos H.[7]
6-35-76-3
Melzer G.
Bourgue M.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Melzer G.
Struvay E.
6-47-65
Bourgue M.
Estrella V.[1]
6-17-65
Zeballos H.[7]
Samper Montana J.
6-37-64
Lorenzi P.[2]
Elias G.[8]
6-43-67-66
R16
Lorenzi P.[2]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-2
Elias G.[8]
Clezar G.
2-66-46-4
Samper Montana J.
Kicker N.
6-727-56-4
Zeballos H.[7]
Arguello F.
6-33-66-4
Melzer G.
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-43-66-2
Struvay E.
Trinker B.
6-46-1
Estrella V.[1]
Hernandez J.
6-34-67-5
Bourgue M.
Cachin P.
6-46-3
R32
Lorenzi P.[2]
Martin A.
6-32-66-3
Andreozzi G.
Hemery C.
6-36-2
Arguello F.
Barrientos N.
7-51-0
Melzer G.
Estevez M.
3-67-56-1
Struvay E.
Gonzalez A.
3-67-56-3
Trinker B.
Montanes A.[4]
6-736-46-4
Cachin P.
Falla A.[6]
7-606-3
Bourgue M.
Riba P.
6-46-3
Hernandez J.
Galan D.
6-26-3
Estrella V.[1]
De Greef A.
7-656-3
Clezar G.
Lapentti G.
6-27-5
Elias G.[8]
Lindell C.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Bagnis F.[3]
6-34-67-68
Samper Montana J.
Paul T.
6-36-3
Zeballos H.[7]
Jarry N.
7-617-5
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Dutra Silva R.[5]
6-46-4