Mikhail Youzhny vs Lukas Lacko — Manila CH Semi-final

Manila CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
RUS2
Mikhail Youzhny
44 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 January 2016
hard
SVK3
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Youzhny M.
1-6 7-6 7-5
Lacko L.
Youzhny M.
17972
Lacko L.
66751

Mikhail Youzhny defeated Lukas Lacko 1-6 7-6 7-5 in the Manila CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Mikhail Youzhny came in leading the head-to-head 4–0. Mikhail Youzhny extended the head-to-head to 5–0.

Key context

Head to head

4–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-01-30ZagrebFhardMikhail Youzhny6-2 6-3
2010-05-24Roland GarrosR64clayMikhail Youzhny6-7(8) 6-3 6-3 6-2
2010-05-09Madrid MastersR64clayMikhail Youzhny2-6 6-3 6-1
2010-02-22DubaiR32hardMikhail Youzhny6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Youzhny M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Youzhny M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Youzhny M.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.7
7.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (165 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Youzhny M.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
86
Break points won·Dominant
41
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Youzhny M.[2]
Chiudinelli M.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Youzhny M.[2]
Lacko L.[3]
1-67-677-5
Chiudinelli M.
Soeda G.[4]
5-77-657-64
Quarter-finals
Youzhny M.[2]
Naso G.
6-26-2
Lacko L.[3]
Sijsling I.[7]
6-46-2
Soeda G.[4]
Guez D.
6-33-66-4
Chiudinelli M.
Li Z.
6-47-61
R16
Youzhny M.[2]
Mertens Y.
6-36-4
Naso G.
Coppejans K.[5]
6-37-64
Sijsling I.[7]
Weintraub A.
6-26-2
Guez D.
Fabbiano T.[6]
6-13-66-3
Li Z.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-776-4
Chiudinelli M.
Vanni L.[1]
6-31-66-4
Soeda G.[4]
Moriya H.
6-41-66-3
Lacko L.[3]
Gaio F.
6-13-66-1
R32
Youzhny M.[2]
Jung J.
6-27-65
Mertens Y.
Gerasimov E.
5-76-26-4
Naso G.
Nielsen F.
6-37-63
Coppejans K.[5]
Patrombon J.
6-26-2
Lacko L.[3]
Wang J.
6-36-3
Weintraub A.
Alcantara F.
6-16-3
Sijsling I.[7]
Gonzales R.
6-26-2
Fabbiano T.[6]
Mektic N.
6-36-796-3
Guez D.
Lim A.
6-46-0
Moriya H.
Lee D.
6-46-7106-2
Soeda G.[4]
Marcora R.
7-646-1
Roca Batalla O.
Devvarman S.[8]
7-56-707-64
Li Z.
Giustino L.
6-33-66-4
Chiudinelli M.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-716-46-4
Vanni L.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-2
Gaio F.
Krstin P.
2-66-44-0