Yannick Mertens vs Egor Gerasimov — Manila CH Round of 32

Manila CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BEL
Yannick Mertens
39 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 January 2016
hard
BLR
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Mertens Y.
5-7 6-2 6-4
Gerasimov E.
Mertens Y.
5662
Gerasimov E.
7241

Yannick Mertens defeated Egor Gerasimov 5-7 6-2 6-4 in the Manila CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Yannick Mertens came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Yannick Mertens extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-05-23Roland GarrosQ1clayYannick Mertens6-3 2-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Mertens Y.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Gerasimov E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mertens Y.

Serve advantage — Gerasimov E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mertens Y.Gerasimov E.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.6
6.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (100 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mertens Y.Gerasimov E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
44
Break points saved·Dominant
30
88
Break points won·Even
5
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
2
70
Tiebreaks·Even
38
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Youzhny M.[2]
Chiudinelli M.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Youzhny M.[2]
Lacko L.[3]
1-67-677-5
Chiudinelli M.
Soeda G.[4]
5-77-657-64
Quarter-finals
Youzhny M.[2]
Naso G.
6-26-2
Lacko L.[3]
Sijsling I.[7]
6-46-2
Soeda G.[4]
Guez D.
6-33-66-4
Chiudinelli M.
Li Z.
6-47-61
R16
Youzhny M.[2]
Mertens Y.
6-36-4
Naso G.
Coppejans K.[5]
6-37-64
Sijsling I.[7]
Weintraub A.
6-26-2
Guez D.
Fabbiano T.[6]
6-13-66-3
Li Z.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-776-4
Chiudinelli M.
Vanni L.[1]
6-31-66-4
Soeda G.[4]
Moriya H.
6-41-66-3
Lacko L.[3]
Gaio F.
6-13-66-1
R32
Youzhny M.[2]
Jung J.
6-27-65
Mertens Y.
Gerasimov E.
5-76-26-4
Naso G.
Nielsen F.
6-37-63
Coppejans K.[5]
Patrombon J.
6-26-2
Lacko L.[3]
Wang J.
6-36-3
Weintraub A.
Alcantara F.
6-16-3
Sijsling I.[7]
Gonzales R.
6-26-2
Fabbiano T.[6]
Mektic N.
6-36-796-3
Guez D.
Lim A.
6-46-0
Moriya H.
Lee D.
6-46-7106-2
Soeda G.[4]
Marcora R.
7-646-1
Roca Batalla O.
Devvarman S.[8]
7-56-707-64
Li Z.
Giustino L.
6-33-66-4
Chiudinelli M.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-716-46-4
Vanni L.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-2
Gaio F.
Krstin P.
2-66-44-0