Thomas Fabbiano vs Nikola Mektic — Manila CH Round of 32

Manila CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA6
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 January 2016
hard
CRO
Nikola Mektic
37 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Fabbiano T.
6-3 6-7 6-3
Mektic N.
Fabbiano T.
66962
Mektic N.
371131

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Nikola Mektic 6-3 6-7 6-3 in the Manila CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Thomas Fabbiano came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Thomas Fabbiano extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Thomas Fabbiano closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-08-14Cincinnati MastersQ1hardThomas Fabbiano7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mektic N.

Mektic N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Serve advantage — Mektic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Mektic N.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Mektic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
9
Break points saved·Dominant
81
55
Break points won·Slight edge
16
11
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
16
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Youzhny M.[2]
Chiudinelli M.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Youzhny M.[2]
Lacko L.[3]
1-67-677-5
Chiudinelli M.
Soeda G.[4]
5-77-657-64
Quarter-finals
Youzhny M.[2]
Naso G.
6-26-2
Lacko L.[3]
Sijsling I.[7]
6-46-2
Soeda G.[4]
Guez D.
6-33-66-4
Chiudinelli M.
Li Z.
6-47-61
R16
Youzhny M.[2]
Mertens Y.
6-36-4
Naso G.
Coppejans K.[5]
6-37-64
Sijsling I.[7]
Weintraub A.
6-26-2
Guez D.
Fabbiano T.[6]
6-13-66-3
Li Z.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-776-4
Chiudinelli M.
Vanni L.[1]
6-31-66-4
Soeda G.[4]
Moriya H.
6-41-66-3
Lacko L.[3]
Gaio F.
6-13-66-1
R32
Youzhny M.[2]
Jung J.
6-27-65
Mertens Y.
Gerasimov E.
5-76-26-4
Naso G.
Nielsen F.
6-37-63
Coppejans K.[5]
Patrombon J.
6-26-2
Lacko L.[3]
Wang J.
6-36-3
Weintraub A.
Alcantara F.
6-16-3
Sijsling I.[7]
Gonzales R.
6-26-2
Fabbiano T.[6]
Mektic N.
6-36-796-3
Guez D.
Lim A.
6-46-0
Moriya H.
Lee D.
6-46-7106-2
Soeda G.[4]
Marcora R.
7-646-1
Roca Batalla O.
Devvarman S.[8]
7-56-707-64
Li Z.
Giustino L.
6-33-66-4
Chiudinelli M.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-716-46-4
Vanni L.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-2
Gaio F.
Krstin P.
2-66-44-0