Nao Hibino vs Pauline Parmentier — Hobart Round of 32

Hobart · WTA · Round of 32
Nao Hibino
JPN
Nao Hibino
#246WTA
1560ELO
1523Hard ELO
31 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 January 2016
hard
FRA
Pauline Parmentier
40 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWL
Hibino N.
7-6 6-1
Parmentier P.
Hibino N.
7762
Parmentier P.
6110

Nao Hibino defeated Pauline Parmentier 7-6 6-1 in the Hobart round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Nao Hibino came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hibino N.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Parmentier P.

Parmentier P.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Hibino N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hibino N.Parmentier P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
44%
Service points won·Even
56%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
54%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 192). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hibino N.Parmentier P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
15
Break points saved·Even
39
39
Break points won·Dominant
91
41
Deciding sets·Clear edge
66
53
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Hibino N.Parmentier P.
Freshness·
100
—

Hibino N.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CPartly cloudy
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 39%

Draw

Final
Cornet A.[7]
Bouchard E.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Bouchard E.
Cibulkova D.[3]
6-14-66-4
Cornet A.[7]
Larsson J.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Cornet A.[7]
Barthel M.[9]
W/O
Bouchard E.
Giorgi C.[2]
6-36-2
Cibulkova D.[3]
Bertens K.
7-56-3
Larsson J.
Watson H.
3-66-46-4
R16
Giorgi C.[2]
Hibino N.
6-26-3
Bouchard E.
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
6-47-5
Bertens K.
Beck A.
6-36-1
Cibulkova D.[3]
Birrell K.
6-16-0
Larsson J.
Gasparyan M.
6-33-66-3
Watson H.
Niculescu M.[4]
6-736-27-63
Cornet A.[7]
Cepede Royg V.
6-45-76-2
Barthel M.[9]
Osaka N.
7-626-2
R32
Bertens K.
Brengle M.[5]
6-01-1
Hibino N.
Parmentier P.
7-616-1
Barthel M.[9]
Doi M.
6-46-4
Gasparyan M.
Inglis M.
6-46-3
Cornet A.[7]
Allertova D.
6-47-5
Giorgi C.[2]
Diyas Z.
6-41-66-1
Bouchard E.
Mattek Sands B.
6-26-1
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
Witthoeft C.
6-27-65
Cibulkova D.[3]
Konta J.
7-667-5
Birrell K.
Kovinic D.
6-46-3
Beck A.
Nara K.
6-46-3
Larsson J.
Strycova B.[6]
6-46-4
Watson H.
Pereira T.
6-36-0
Niculescu M.[4]
Mchale C.
7-57-5
Cepede Royg V.
Pous Tio L.
6-32-66-1
Osaka N.
Gajdosova J.
6-767-686-4