Naomi Osaka vs Jarmila Gajdosova — Hobart Round of 32

Hobart · WTA · Round of 32
Naomi Osaka
JPN
Naomi Osaka
#14WTA
1987ELO
1922Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$26MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 January 2016
hard
AUS
Jarmila Gajdosova
39 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Osaka N.
6-7 7-6 6-4
Gajdosova J.
Osaka N.
6671062
Gajdosova J.
786841

Naomi Osaka defeated Jarmila Gajdosova 6-7 7-6 6-4 in the Hobart round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Osaka N.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gajdosova J.

Gajdosova J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Osaka N.

Serve advantage — Osaka N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Osaka N.Gajdosova J.
70
Serve
—
60
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Osaka N.Gajdosova J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
48%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
74%
57%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
41%
Service points won·Clear edge
63%
49%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
50%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.6
6.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (196 vs 3). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Osaka N.Gajdosova J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
4
Break points saved·Dominant
96
42
Break points won·Dominant
97
40
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Osaka N.Gajdosova J.
Freshness·
82
—

Osaka N.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 44 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CPartly cloudy
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 39%

Draw

Final
Cornet A.[7]
Bouchard E.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Bouchard E.
Cibulkova D.[3]
6-14-66-4
Cornet A.[7]
Larsson J.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Cornet A.[7]
Barthel M.[9]
W/O
Bouchard E.
Giorgi C.[2]
6-36-2
Cibulkova D.[3]
Bertens K.
7-56-3
Larsson J.
Watson H.
3-66-46-4
R16
Giorgi C.[2]
Hibino N.
6-26-3
Bouchard E.
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
6-47-5
Bertens K.
Beck A.
6-36-1
Cibulkova D.[3]
Birrell K.
6-16-0
Larsson J.
Gasparyan M.
6-33-66-3
Watson H.
Niculescu M.[4]
6-736-27-63
Cornet A.[7]
Cepede Royg V.
6-45-76-2
Barthel M.[9]
Osaka N.
7-626-2
R32
Bertens K.
Brengle M.[5]
6-01-1
Hibino N.
Parmentier P.
7-616-1
Barthel M.[9]
Doi M.
6-46-4
Gasparyan M.
Inglis M.
6-46-3
Cornet A.[7]
Allertova D.
6-47-5
Giorgi C.[2]
Diyas Z.
6-41-66-1
Bouchard E.
Mattek Sands B.
6-26-1
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
Witthoeft C.
6-27-65
Cibulkova D.[3]
Konta J.
7-667-5
Birrell K.
Kovinic D.
6-46-3
Beck A.
Nara K.
6-46-3
Larsson J.
Strycova B.[6]
6-46-4
Watson H.
Pereira T.
6-36-0
Niculescu M.[4]
Mchale C.
7-57-5
Cepede Royg V.
Pous Tio L.
6-32-66-1
Osaka N.
Gajdosova J.
6-767-686-4