Daniel Gimeno Traver vs Matthew Ebden — Canberra CH Round of 32

Canberra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP
Daniel Gimeno Traver
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 January 2016
hard
AUS
Matthew Ebden
38 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Gimeno Traver D.
6-2 6-7 6-1
Ebden M.
Gimeno Traver D.
66562
Ebden M.
27711

Daniel Gimeno Traver defeated Matthew Ebden 6-2 6-7 6-1 in the Canberra CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Matthew Ebden came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Gimeno Traver came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–2 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gimeno Traver D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ebden M.

Ebden M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gimeno Traver D.

Serve advantage — Ebden M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gimeno Traver D.Ebden M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
64%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.2
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.6
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gimeno Traver D.Ebden M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
15
45
Break points saved·Dominant
50
86
Break points won·Even
30
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
59
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
20
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Lorenzi P.[1]
Dodig I.[5]
6-26-4
Duckworth J.[5]
Polmans M.[9]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Dodig I.[5]
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
6-16-3
Lorenzi P.[1]
Granollers M.[4]
7-56-707-5
Duckworth J.[5]
Thompson J.[1]
6-36-4
Polmans M.[9]
Jasika O.
5-76-37-64
Quarter-finals
Granollers M.[4]
Halys Q.
6-30-0
Dodig I.[5]
Giraldo S.[2]
7-616-3
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Schwartzman D.[6]
6-40-0
Lorenzi P.[1]
Donskoy E.[7]
6-46-1
Jasika O.
Jones G.
6-36-1
Polmans M.[9]
Nolan D.
6-27-5
Thompson J.[1]
Smith J.[8]
6-17-65
Duckworth J.[5]
Masur D.
6-16-4
R16
Giraldo S.[2]
Purcell M.
6-26-756-3
Dodig I.[5]
Gimeno Traver D.
6-36-2
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Gao X.
7-636-3
Schwartzman D.[6]
Moser F.
6-47-64
Halys Q.
Whittington A.
3-67-656-4
Granollers M.[4]
Banes M.
6-46-3
Donskoy E.[7]
Rubin N.
1-66-26-0
Lorenzi P.[1]
Nishioka Y.
7-56-1
Jasika O.
Zemlja G.[6]
6-16-4
Jones G.
Purcell M.
6-37-63
Polmans M.[9]
Sekiguchi S.
6-16-2
Nolan D.
De Waard S.
6-26-2
Duckworth J.[5]
Nagal S.
6-36-3
Masur D.
Banes M.
7-626-3
Thompson J.[1]
Ebden M.
6-06-2
Smith J.[8]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-16-2
R32
Banes M.
Tsitsipas S.
6-36-4
Giraldo S.[2]
Sela D.
6-36-3
Purcell M.
Hobart D.
6-16-4
Gimeno Traver D.
Ebden M.
6-26-756-1
Dodig I.[5]
Kelly D.
7-656-4
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Betov S.
6-46-3
Moser F.
De Waard S.
6-46-3
Schwartzman D.[6]
Popyrin A.
6-36-2
Whittington A.
Basilashvili N.
7-56-716-2
Granollers M.[4]
Mott B.
7-656-3
Donskoy E.[7]
Nolan D.
6-16-1
Rubin N.
De Minaur A.
6-706-26-4
Nishioka Y.
Chaplin J.
3-66-16-4
Lorenzi P.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-46-4
Halys Q.
Daniel T.[8]
4-67-57-65
Gao X.
Ehara H.
6-16-2
Jones G.
Polkinghorne D.
6-17-65
Purcell M.
Bourchier H.
6-47-61
Zemlja G.[6]
Tearney F.
6-36-4
Polmans M.[9]
Balaji N.
6-26-4
Nolan D.
Barton M.[7]
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[5]
Van Peperzeel G.
6-756-36-4
Nagal S.
Kelly D.
6-41-66-2
Banes M.
Gunneswaran P.
6-37-5
Masur D.
Trungelliti M.[4]
6-33-66-4
Smith J.[8]
Mott B.
6-46-756-2
Sundar Prashanth N.
Saville L.
6-46-2
Ebden M.
Pasha N.
6-31-66-2
Thompson J.[1]
Reid M.
6-17-5
Jasika O.
Oconnell C.
6-46-4
Sekiguchi S.
Jenkins J.
2-66-36-0
De Waard S.
Fancutt T.
6-46-1