Jose Hernandez vs Martin Cuevas — Buenos Aires CH Round of 32
Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 January 2016
clay
Hernandez J.7-5 6-4
Cuevas M.
Hernandez J.
762
Cuevas M.
540
Jose Hernandez defeated Martin Cuevas 7-5 6-4 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jose Hernandez came in leading the head-to-head 3–0. Jose Hernandez extended the head-to-head to 4–0.
Key context
- Match story: Jose Hernandez edged Martin Cuevas in two tight sets (7–5 6–4).
Head to head
3–0| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Davis Cup G1 R1: DOM vs URU | RR | clay | Jose Hernandez | 6-1 7-6(7) |
| 2014-01-31 | Davis Cup G1 R1: DOM vs URU | RR | clay | Jose Hernandez | 6-3 7-6(3) 6-3 |
| 2013-02-01 | Davis Cup G1 R1: URU vs DOM | RR | clay | Jose Hernandez | 6-4 6-1 6-3 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Clear edge
68%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
5.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
4.1
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 167). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
24
14
Break points saved·Even
34
35
Break points won·Even
26
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
38
20
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
71
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Bagnis F.[5]
Dutra Silva R.[2]
3-66-26-2
De Greef A.
Kicker N.
7-646-3
Olivo R.[5]
Hernandez J.
5-77-56-2
Mayer L.[7]
Dutra Silva R.[6]
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Dutra Silva R.[2]
Melzer G.
6-16-736-2
Bagnis F.[5]
Andreozzi G.
6-33-67-5
De Greef A.
Gonzalez M.[8]
6-37-5
Kicker N.
Hamou M.
6-46-2
Olivo R.[5]
Sousa P.
6-26-3
Hernandez J.
Munar J.
5-77-56-2
Dutra Silva R.[6]
Zeballos H.[1]
6-37-66
Mayer L.[7]
Monteiro T.[4]
6-26-3
R16
De Greef A.
Carballes Baena R.[3]
1-66-37-5
Dutra Silva R.[2]
Lipovsek Puches T.
4-66-16-2
Andreozzi G.
Arguello F.[4]
7-56-2
Bagnis F.[5]
Hernandez J.
6-36-2
Gonzalez M.[8]
Michon A.
6-26-4
Hamou M.
Souza J.[6]
6-746-46-2
Kicker N.
Torebko P.
6-26-3
Melzer G.
Bangoura S.
6-46-2
Hernandez J.
Bagnis F.[2]
1-67-626-4
Munar J.
Andreozzi G.[8]
6-37-61
Sousa P.
Paz J.
7-57-5
Olivo R.[5]
Collarini A.
6-26-1
Monteiro T.[4]
Gonzalez M.
4-66-36-2
Zeballos H.[1]
Velotti A.
7-623-66-3
Dutra Silva R.[6]
Kicker N.
6-16-726-3
Mayer L.[7]
Mena F.
6-34-66-4
R32
Bangoura S.
Martin A.[7]
6-16-2
Dutra Silva R.[2]
Zukas M.
6-16-2
Lipovsek Puches T.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-26-3
Melzer G.
Cachin P.
7-662-66-2
Andreozzi G.
Velotti A.
6-25-76-1
Hernandez J.
Cuevas M.
7-56-4
Bagnis F.[5]
Molteni A.
6-06-3
Gonzalez M.[8]
Eysseric J.
6-46-3
Michon A.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-36-4
De Greef A.
Lindell C.
6-26-3
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Arevalo M.
7-656-1
Souza J.[6]
Clezar G.
6-36-4
Hamou M.
Mina G.
6-26-2
Kicker N.
Casanova H.
3-66-36-2
Torebko P.
Estevez M.
6-46-4
Arguello F.[4]
Agamenone F.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.[8]
Arguello F.
6-24-66-4
Paz J.
Sorgi J.
6-34-66-1
Sousa P.
Zormann Da Silva M.
6-16-4
Collarini A.
Ruud C.
3-66-26-2
Olivo R.[5]
Londero J.
1-66-46-4
Mayer L.[7]
Hidalgo G.
6-36-1
Mena F.
Sakamoto P.
4-66-46-3
Gonzalez M.
Estevez M.
6-46-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Michon A.
7-632-67-612
Dutra Silva R.[6]
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-16-3
Kicker N.
Santanna B.
6-47-64
Velotti A.
Coria F.
5-77-666-1
Zeballos H.[1]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-16-3
Bagnis F.[2]
Linzer M.
7-616-2
Munar J.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-3
Hernandez J.
Kestelboim M.
2-66-26-3