Annika Beck vs Kurumi Nara — Hobart Round of 32

Hobart · WTA · Round of 32
GER
Annika Beck
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 January 2016
hard
JPN
Kurumi Nara
34 yrs · 155 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWLL
Beck A.
6-4 6-3
Nara K.
Beck A.
662
Nara K.
430

Annika Beck defeated Kurumi Nara 6-4 6-3 in the Hobart round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kurumi Nara came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's semi-final. Annika Beck claimed a first win over Kurumi Nara in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Annika Beck closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-03-17MiamiR128hardKurumi Nara7-6(2) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Beck A.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Nara K.

Nara K.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Beck A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Beck A.Nara K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
73%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
55%
58%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
41%
46%
Service points won·Even
51%
54%
Return points won·Even
46%
46%
Break points saved·Even
49%
53%
Aces / match·Even
0.6
0.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 185). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Beck A.Nara K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
11
5
Break points saved·Even
13
14
Break points won·Slight edge
82
73
Deciding sets·Dominant
34
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
65

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CPartly cloudy
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 39%

Draw

Final
Cornet A.[7]
Bouchard E.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Bouchard E.
Cibulkova D.[3]
6-14-66-4
Cornet A.[7]
Larsson J.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Cornet A.[7]
Barthel M.[9]
W/O
Bouchard E.
Giorgi C.[2]
6-36-2
Cibulkova D.[3]
Bertens K.
7-56-3
Larsson J.
Watson H.
3-66-46-4
R16
Giorgi C.[2]
Hibino N.
6-26-3
Bouchard E.
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
6-47-5
Bertens K.
Beck A.
6-36-1
Cibulkova D.[3]
Birrell K.
6-16-0
Larsson J.
Gasparyan M.
6-33-66-3
Watson H.
Niculescu M.[4]
6-736-27-63
Cornet A.[7]
Cepede Royg V.
6-45-76-2
Barthel M.[9]
Osaka N.
7-626-2
R32
Bertens K.
Brengle M.[5]
6-01-1
Hibino N.
Parmentier P.
7-616-1
Barthel M.[9]
Doi M.
6-46-4
Gasparyan M.
Inglis M.
6-46-3
Cornet A.[7]
Allertova D.
6-47-5
Giorgi C.[2]
Diyas Z.
6-41-66-1
Bouchard E.
Mattek Sands B.
6-26-1
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
Witthoeft C.
6-27-65
Cibulkova D.[3]
Konta J.
7-667-5
Birrell K.
Kovinic D.
6-46-3
Beck A.
Nara K.
6-46-3
Larsson J.
Strycova B.[6]
6-46-4
Watson H.
Pereira T.
6-36-0
Niculescu M.[4]
Mchale C.
7-57-5
Cepede Royg V.
Pous Tio L.
6-32-66-1
Osaka N.
Gajdosova J.
6-767-686-4