Taylor Fritz vs Daniel Evans — Champaign CH Round of 16

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Taylor Fritz
USA
Taylor Fritz
#10ATP
1909ELO
1839Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 November 2015
hard
Daniel Evans
GBR
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
Fritz T.
6-2 3-6 6-4
Evans D.
Fritz T.
6362
Evans D.
2641

Taylor Fritz defeated Daniel Evans 6-2 3-6 6-4 in the Champaign CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Taylor Fritz came in ranked #10. Taylor Fritz narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Taylor Fritz closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-08Canada MastersR16hardDaniel Evans7-6(5) 1-6 7-5
2022-08-01WashingtonR16hardDaniel Evans3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 RET
2021-05-10Rome MastersR64clayTaylor Fritz6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Fritz T.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Evans D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fritz T.Evans D.
76
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fritz T.Evans D.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.5
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fritz T.Evans D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
87
73
Break points saved·Even
100
97
Break points won·Even
60
61
Deciding sets·Clear edge
98
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fritz T.Evans D.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
100

Fritz T.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d) · Evans D.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Laaksonen H.
Fritz T.
4-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Fritz T.
Mcdonald M.
6-746-26-2
Laaksonen H.
Thompson C.
5-76-37-62
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-16-2
Laaksonen H.
Quigley E.
3-66-06-1
Mcdonald M.
Krueger M.
7-56-1
Thompson C.
Krajicek A.[2]
4-67-56-3
R16
Mcdonald M.
Harrison R.[3]
2-66-10-0
Jaziri M.[1]
Nguyen D.
7-57-65
Fritz T.
Evans D.
6-23-66-4
Krueger M.
Smith J.[6]
7-57-63
Quigley E.
Tiafoe F.
6-36-736-4
Laaksonen H.
Nielsen F.
3-67-667-63
Thompson C.
Rola B.[8]
7-646-3
Krajicek A.[2]
Bossel A.
7-636-3
R32
Jaziri M.[1]
Rubin N.
6-46-2
Fritz T.
Lapentti G.
6-36-2
Evans D.
Fratangelo B.[7]
6-36-3
Harrison R.[3]
Michalicka M.
6-36-3
Mcdonald M.
Hiltzik J.
3-66-16-0
Krueger M.
Donaldson J.
6-46-4
Nguyen D.
Mmoh M.
6-46-3
Quigley E.
Paul T.
6-46-3
Nielsen F.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-36-4
Smith J.[6]
Novikov D.
7-626-2
Tiafoe F.
Falla A.[5]
4-66-36-2
Laaksonen H.
Buchanan C.
7-656-3
Rola B.[8]
Broady L.
6-36-3
Thompson C.
Nevolo D.
4-66-47-62
Bossel A.
Kavcic B.
6-26-1
Krajicek A.[2]
Sarmiento R.
6-46-4