Mitchell Krueger vs Jared Donaldson — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 November 2015
hard
USA
Jared Donaldson
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Krueger M.
6-4 6-4
Donaldson J.
Krueger M.
662
Donaldson J.
440

Mitchell Krueger defeated Jared Donaldson 6-4 6-4 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jared Donaldson came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Mitchell Krueger edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Donaldson J.

Donaldson J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Donaldson J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
53%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Donaldson J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
16
35
Break points saved·Even
87
84
Break points won·Slight edge
14
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
13
29
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Donaldson J.
Freshness·
87
—

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Laaksonen H.
Fritz T.
4-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Fritz T.
Mcdonald M.
6-746-26-2
Laaksonen H.
Thompson C.
5-76-37-62
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-16-2
Laaksonen H.
Quigley E.
3-66-06-1
Mcdonald M.
Krueger M.
7-56-1
Thompson C.
Krajicek A.[2]
4-67-56-3
R16
Mcdonald M.
Harrison R.[3]
2-66-10-0
Jaziri M.[1]
Nguyen D.
7-57-65
Fritz T.
Evans D.
6-23-66-4
Krueger M.
Smith J.[6]
7-57-63
Quigley E.
Tiafoe F.
6-36-736-4
Laaksonen H.
Nielsen F.
3-67-667-63
Thompson C.
Rola B.[8]
7-646-3
Krajicek A.[2]
Bossel A.
7-636-3
R32
Jaziri M.[1]
Rubin N.
6-46-2
Fritz T.
Lapentti G.
6-36-2
Evans D.
Fratangelo B.[7]
6-36-3
Harrison R.[3]
Michalicka M.
6-36-3
Mcdonald M.
Hiltzik J.
3-66-16-0
Krueger M.
Donaldson J.
6-46-4
Nguyen D.
Mmoh M.
6-46-3
Quigley E.
Paul T.
6-46-3
Nielsen F.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-36-4
Smith J.[6]
Novikov D.
7-626-2
Tiafoe F.
Falla A.[5]
4-66-36-2
Laaksonen H.
Buchanan C.
7-656-3
Rola B.[8]
Broady L.
6-36-3
Thompson C.
Nevolo D.
4-66-47-62
Bossel A.
Kavcic B.
6-26-1
Krajicek A.[2]
Sarmiento R.
6-46-4