Lukas Lacko vs Andrey Rublev — Bratislava CH Round of 16

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
SVK4
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 November 2015
hard
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Lacko L.
6-7 7-6 6-4
Rublev A.
Lacko L.
657762
Rublev A.
776141

Lukas Lacko defeated Andrey Rublev 6-7 7-6 6-4 in the Bratislava CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lukas Lacko came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lacko L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Lacko L.Rublev A.
—
Serve
55
—
Return
49

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Lacko L.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Even
7.4
7.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lacko L.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
88
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
100
Break points won·Dominant
8
72
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Lacko L.Rublev A.
Freshness·
—
100

Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Gerasimov E.
Lacko L.[4]
7-617-65
Semi-finals
Gerasimov E.
Copil M.
7-642-66-2
Lacko L.[4]
Marchenko I.[2]
6-43-67-67
Quarter-finals
Gerasimov E.
Gombos N.[6]
7-626-7127-65
Copil M.
Roger-Vasselin E.[8]
7-655-76-3
Lacko L.[4]
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Marchenko I.[2]
Stepanek R.
4-66-46-3
R16
Gerasimov E.
Rosol L.[1]
6-37-64
Gombos N.[6]
Gojowczyk P.
6-37-5
Copil M.
Struff J.[3]
6-46-3
Roger-Vasselin E.[8]
Youzhny M.
6-47-63
Vatutin A.
Smirnov A.
3-67-667-61
Lacko L.[4]
Rublev A.
6-757-616-4
Stepanek R.
Ignatik U.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.[2]
Satral J.
6-46-4
R32
Rosol L.[1]
Brands D.
7-6146-3
Roger-Vasselin E.[8]
Przysiezny M.
4-2
Rublev A.
Pavlasek A.
6-40-0
Gerasimov E.
Weintraub A.
6-26-1
Gojowczyk P.
Celikbilek A.
7-56-1
Gombos N.[6]
Karatsev A.
6-36-3
Struff J.[3]
Sijsling I.
7-656-4
Copil M.
Kalenichenko D.
6-36-4
Youzhny M.
Blasko M.
6-46-0
Vatutin A.
Dustov F.[5]
6-36-4
Smirnov A.
Nedovyesov A.
6-17-67
Lacko L.[4]
Ymer M.
6-46-2
Stepanek R.
Ymer E.[7]
6-47-65
Ignatik U.
Molcan A.
4-66-36-3
Satral J.
Kovalik J.
6-737-686-4
Marchenko I.[2]
Pavic A.
7-666-4